Percentage of Household Income Distribution, by Quintile: 2017

Income is not distributed evenly across California households. Across the state, some families can comfortably provide for their children’s needs and wants while other families struggle to provide basic clothing, food, and shelter. Some level of income inequality is expected, but when a portion of families cannot support their children’s basic needs, then it is a sign that income inequality has become too wide and poverty has become too deep.

Kidsdata has added new measures of income inequality: Household Income Distribution, by Quintile and the Gini Index of Household Income Inequality, with data available by city, county, school district, and legislative district. The indicator, Household Income Distribution, ranks households by their level of income, divides them into five equally sized groups, then determines the share of aggregate income that each quintile receives, where 20% for each group would represent income equality. The Gini Index expresses income inequality on a scale of 0 and 1, where 0 represents income equality.

How much of the pie do the highest earners get in California? Those in the highest quintile earned an estimated 52% of all household income in 2017, compared with a 3% share of total income earned by households in the lowest quintile.

Two counties (Marin and San Francisco Counties) with the highest level of income inequality in California, as measured by the Gini index, also have some of the highest family median annual incomes in the state, among counties with data in 2017.

While some income inequality is inherent in the economic structure of our society, extreme disparity reflects social and political choices. Let us prioritize children by shaping policies and practices that ensure their basic needs are met so that they may reach their maximum health potential.

Learn more about income inequality »

Additional Resources

Learn about Stockton’s approach to addressing income inequality with the country’s first-ever city-led Guaranteed Income initiative.

The New Importance of Children in America argues that our standard of living and future economy demand that children become our highest priority.

Recently Released Data

In addition to measures of income inequality, we have recently updated data on Early Care and Education. See links to the latest here.

Posted by kidsdata.org

Children in Poverty, Federal Poverty Threshold, Ages 0-17: 2008-2017

Too many families lack the means to meet their children’s basic needs. Poverty directly impacts access to housing, food, child care, education, and health services, and indirectly affects the ability of parents to meet their children’s social and emotional needs – all crucial to children’s health, development, well-being and future success.

Kidsdata has released updated data on three ways to measure poverty: the federal poverty threshold, the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), and the California Poverty Measure (CPM). These three measures have different historical origins and incorporate different components of poverty. As with all of the topics we address, details about how an indicator is measured are provided in the “Measures of” section under tables and figures.

Kidsdata and the Population Reference Bureau recently reviewed data about poverty starting at birth. Learn more.

How are California children faring? Based on the federal poverty threshold, 18% of California children who were ages 0 to 17 were below the family poverty threshold of $24,858 in 2017, similar to the rate a decade ago. This measure compares pre-tax cash income against a threshold of three times the cost of a minimally adequate diet in 1963, adjusted for inflation. It is best used for measuring poverty over time, and it forms the basis for some administrative determinations.

Children in Poverty, Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), Ages 0-17: 2016

Based on the SPM, 22% of California children who were ages 0-17 were in poverty in 2016. This measure builds on the official poverty measure by accounting for expenditures and resources such as utilities and state-level differences in housing costs and government benefits and tax credits. It is useful for national and state comparisons.

Children in Poverty, California Poverty Measure (CPM), by Age Group: 2014-2016

Based on the CPM, 23% of California children who were ages 0-5 were in poverty in 2014-2016. The CPM refines poverty measurement by accounting for expenditures and resources that are California-specific such as regional differences in housing cost. It is best used for in-state assessments and comparisons.

Policy and programmatic planning can influence poverty, even in areas where it may not seem relevant. For example, transportation planners might consider how public transit routes can efficiently connect their higher poverty and more rural constituents to health facilities. Addressing child poverty is essential to assuring a vibrant social and economic environment.

Learn more about additional policy and program options to address poverty »

Additional Resources

California’s Future, a publication from the Public Policy Institute of California, provides an objective assessment of the housing crisis, health care, education system and more.

April 1, 2019 signals that there is one year until National Census Day, the reference day used for the 2020 U.S. Census. The Census Counts Campaign offers suggestions on ways to raise awareness of the critical importance of participating in the Census.

Recently Released Data

We recently released data on Family Income and Poverty. This release brings you 47 indicators including new breakdowns by legislative district. The topic includes data on poverty, deep poverty and concentrated poverty. Also in this topic, we include previously released data on poverty among mothers who recently gave birth. See links to the latest here.

Posted by kidsdata.org

Poverty can alter children’s developmental trajectories in cognitive, socio-emotional, and physical health. The effects of poverty on child health and well-being can begin during pregnancy, as low-income women are more likely to experience risk factors such as malnutrition and stress, and are less likely to receive prenatal care. Children who face economic hardship when they are young, or who experience deep and prolonged poverty, are at greatest risk for poor outcomes.

A 2-page overview of this topic is available here.

Kidsdata and the Population Reference Bureau also reviewed data about poverty starting at birth. The analyses included poverty among infants ages 0-2 since 2012, among children ages 0-5 since 1969, and among children ages 0-17 since 1959. See links to the data sets below. For more information about poverty among children in California, visit the Family Income and Poverty topic.

Data Files:

• Poverty Status of People in the United States, by Age, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1959 to 2017
• Poverty Status of Related Children in the United States, Ages 0-5: 1969 to 2017
• Poverty Status for California Children, Ages 0-2: 2012 through 2017
• Poverty Status of Families in California, Ages 0-17: 2017

Posted by kidsdata.org

Childhood Cancer Diagnoses, by Age Group: 2011-2015

Childhood cancer rates of diagnosis are higher among older youth. Similar to rates in the United States, 23 per 100,000 teens ages 15-19 were diagnosed with cancer in California from 2011 to 2015 compared with 16 per 100,000 children under age 15. Difference in cancer rates by age is consistent across race/ethnicity groups. Moreover, older and younger youth are diagnosed with different types of cancer.

Pediatric cancer care is highly specialized depending on the type of cancer. The patient’s age also plays a role in determining the best medical approach to provide each child with the highest chance of survival and full recovery. Palliative care, which provides supportive services for sustaining quality of life during and after treatments, also should be age-specific. Many of us can play a role in improving the quality of life for pediatric patients and their families as they face complex physical, emotional, and logistical challenges throughout diagnoses, hospital stays, and beyond.

Policies and programs are key to maximizing positive health outcome and quality of life for pediatric cancer patients.

Learn more about addressing pediatric cancer in policies & programs »

Additional Resources

Treating Cancers in Adolescents, from the American Cancer Society, describes the uniqueness of treating cancer among older youth.

The Innovation Pop-Up Space at Stanford’s Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Program gives patients a place to create their own inventions while receiving treatment.

Spotlight on Hope Film Camp recognizes that cancer is fought on many fronts. Through creativity and film production, this camp offers a respite to youth who are fighting cancer.

Posted by kidsdata.org

Child Population, Ages 0 to 2: 2018

Kidsdata has expanded its demographic topic content with 22 new indicators and 14 updated indicators. New indicators include sexual orientation, transgender youth, and projected population to 2060. Updated indicators include births, child populations, and school enrollments. Use demographic data to understand the size and composition of the populations in your area and plan appropriate programs to meet your changing community needs.

California had nearly 1.5 million babies, ages 0-2, in 2018 – that is 1.5 million lives where we have an opportunity to ensure safe, nurturing, and healthful environments and supportive infrastructure from the start. Each child is more important to California than ever before. How many babies does your county have?

Learn more about the demographics of children in California »

Data in Action

The Office of Child Abuse Prevention in the CA Department of Social Services are using data to inform prevention strategies against child abuse. They debuted state and county-level dashboards, drawing from kidsdata.org and other sources.

Now Available: LGB Webinar Recording and Slides

Across many indicators of health and well being, lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) youth reported troubling behaviors and consequences at about twice the rate of straight youth. Listen to our recent webinar on this topic and see the latest data on transgender youth.

Posted by kidsdata.org

A positive school climate is paramount to addressing disparities in health and well being among LGB youth in California. We were pleased to host Jenny Betz from WestEd to discuss the latest research on school climate and Hannah Herrick, a UC Berkeley student, to share her high school experience as part of the LGB community. For an overview of key health data, see our latest issue brief.

Issue Briefing Recording:

Issue Briefing Slides

Issue Briefing Q&A

New to Kidsdata: Data on Transgender Youth

See the latest data on transgender youth in California.

• by Gender and Grade Level
• by Level of School Connectedness
• by Parent Education Level
• by Race/Ethnicity
• by Sexual Orientation

Additional Resources

Below are some additional resources that we hope will be helpful in your work:

• GLSEN
• GSA Network
• Local LGBTQ Centers/CenterLink
• Gender Spectrum

Thanks to all who joined us for this enriching and thought-provoking issue briefing. Explore more data on school climate and LGB youth. We always appreciate feedback and are happy to share any additional resources that you may have on this topic. Please email info@kidsdata.org.

Posted by kidsdata.org

Projected Child Population Counts, by Race/Ethnicity: 2020 to 2060

New indicators on projected population point to stagnation of the child population from 2020 to 2060 across all racial/ethnic groups. With an unchanging child population and growing adult population, the importance of children becomes ever greater. Guest author, Beth Jarosz from the Population Reference Bureau, explores these new indicators and explains how they can help inform policies and programs that support children’s health and well being.

California’s total population is expected to grow by more than 10 million people (25 percent) to nearly 51 million between 2020 and 2060. However, the child population is expected to remain virtually unchanged, at just over 9 million, over this same period of time. This forecast, from the California Department of Finance, is based on the current population as well as projections about birth rates, death rates, and migration patterns. Low birth rates contribute to the stable child population forecast while long life expectancy and net in-migration result in projected population growth at older ages.

Population forecast information is valuable for many reasons. Forecasts provide decision makers and the public with valuable clues about the future size and characteristics of the population. At the most basic level, a forecast suggests whether a population is going to grow, shrink, or remain about the same. Many forecasts, including those presented here on Kidsdata.org, also provide predictions about the age and gender, racial/ethnic composition, and geographic location of the population in the future.

Forecast data are used to predict and plan for future needs such as schools and health care facilities. If a community is expected to grow, local officials would plan for additional school and health care facilities to meet the needs of the growing population. If a community is expected to shrink, officials would want to start planning for how to use any no-longer-needed space. Forecast data are also helpful in what-if analysis. For example, an analyst might ask, “If we could eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in child poverty, what would the effect be on the overall child poverty rate?” Forecast data help to answer those questions.

Learn more about the demographics of children in California »

Additional Resources

The New Importance of Children in America

A report from the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health explores the economic impact of declining birth rates. Ensuring the health and well-being of children in the U.S. has never been more critical to the nation’s economic and political future. The shortage of children means each child—regardless of gender, ethnicity, geographic residence or economic background—is proportionately more important to our future than ever before.

Demographic Analyses and Enrollment Forecasts

See how San Francisco Unified School District is using forecasts to predict future needs.

Recently Released Data

Demographics

Births

• by Mother’s Race/Ethnicity

Births Outside of Marriage (California & U.S. Only)

• by Mother’s Race/Ethnicity

Child Population (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)

• by City, School District and County (10,000 Residents or More)
• by Legislative District

Child Population, by Race/Ethnicity (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More) [NEW]

• by Legislative District [NEW]

Children in Rural and Urban Areas (California & U.S. Only)

Child Population, by County

• by Age Group and Gender
• by Race/Ethnicity

Total Population

Projected Child Population, by County [NEW]

• by Age Group and Gender [NEW]
• by Race/Ethnicity [NEW]

Projected Total Population [NEW]

Public School Enrollment

• by Race/Ethnicity

Highest Level of Parent Education, by Child’s Grade Level [NEW]

• by Child’s Gender and Grade Level [NEW]
• by Child’s Level of School Connectedness [NEW]
• by Child’s Race/Ethnicity [NEW]
• by Child’s Sexual Orientation [NEW]

Youth Sexual Orientation, by Grade Level [NEW]

• by Gender and Grade Level [NEW]
• by Level of School Connectedness [NEW]
• by Parent Education Level [NEW]
• by Race/Ethnicity [NEW]

Transgender Youth, by Grade Level [NEW]

• by Gender and Grade Level [NEW]
• by Level of School Connectedness [NEW]
• by Parent Education Level [NEW]
• by Race/Ethnicity [NEW]
• by Sexual Orientation [NEW]

Posted by kidsdata.org

We are looking for a part-time independent contractor to help our team prepare data for kidsdata.org. Preferred candidates will have experience working with data and impeccable attention to detail. See job description.

Posted by kidsdata.org

Webinar

Date: Friday, February 1
Time: 10:00-10:30 AM PST

A new issue brief from Kidsdata reports startling disparities among California youth based on sexual orientation. Across many indicators of health and well being, lesbian, gay and bisexual youth reported troubling behaviors and consequences at about twice the rate of straight youth. Learn about the latest research on school climate and its impact on health and well being of LGB youth. Also, hear a young person’s perspective on her high school experience as part of the LGB community. Audience Q&A is highly encouraged. Speakers will be available for questions immediately after the 30-minute briefing.

Attendees are encouraged to review Kidsdata Issue Brief: Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Youth in California prior to the briefing.

Speakers

Jenny Betz
School Climate Specialist, WestEd

Jenny Betz is a School Climate Specialist in WestEd’s Health & Justice Program, where she engages with schools and districts to improve school climate and wellness. With more than 18 years of experience in the nonprofit sector — local, regional, national, and international — Jenny has a passion for social justice and building the capacity of education stakeholders to ensure safe, affirming, and inclusive learning environments for all. Prior to joining WestEd, Jenny was the Director of Education & Youth Programs at GLSEN, leading national campaigns, programs, and resource development addressing LGBTQ issues in K-12 schools. A native of the Bay Area, Jenny earned a BA in English at St. Mary’s College and an MA in gender/cultural studies at Simmons College, and serves as a member of the International Bullying Prevention Association (IBPA) Board of Directors.

Hannah Herrick
Student, University of California, Berkeley

Hannah Herrick is a sophomore at UC Berkeley with an intended major in Social Welfare and minor in LGBTQ studies. She identifies as bi/pansexual. Hannah is a youth services volunteer with the Pacific Center for Human Growth, the oldest LGBTQ center in the Bay Area. She leads discussions and provides peer support for LGBTQ youth at local middle schools. Hannah is also a member of Bear Closet, a community-based organization at UC Berkeley focused on making the LGBTQ community more accessible to questioning and closeted youth.

Youth in Schools Data

Youth in Schools Data Available on Kidsdata

Posted by kidsdata.org

The Kidsdata Issue Brief: Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Youth in California highlights findings from our latest data release on youth in schools.

Disparities among youth based on sexual orientation are startling. Across many indicators of health and well being, lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) youth in California reported negative behaviors and consequences at about twice the rate of straight youth. Alcohol and drug use were higher, feelings of depression were more common, and skipping school was more frequent among LGB youth.

Addressing these issues early through policies and programs that promote a positive school climate can help mitigate these behaviors and their effects. By maximizing public funding streams, providing enhanced health care services, and integrating systems of support, all students, including LGB students, can experience better long-term health and well being.

Read and share the issue brief »

Issue Briefing: School Climate and California LGB Youth

Date: Friday, February 1
Time: 10:00-10:30 AM PST

Register Now

Learn about the latest research on school climate and its impact on health and well being of LGB youth. Also, hear a young person’s perspective on her high school experience as part of the LGB community. Audience Q&A is highly encouraged. Speakers will be available for questions immediately after the 30-minute briefing.

Posted by kidsdata.org