Download & Other Tools
- Definition: The median is the value at which half of the annual family incomes are higher and half of the incomes are lower.
- Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (Feb. 2014).
- Footnote: These estimates are based on a survey of the population and are subject to both sampling and nonsampling error. N/A means that data are not available.
- Measures of Family Income and Poverty on Kidsdata.org
On kidsdata.org, measures of income and poverty include estimates of:
- The "Self-Sufficiency Standard," which measures how much income is needed for a family of a certain composition living in a particular county to adequately meet its basic needs, and the percentages of families living below the Self-Sufficiency Standard, from the Insight Center for Community Economic Development
- Children in poverty based on the Supplemental Poverty Measure, by race/ethnicity, for California and the U.S. only
- Children in poverty based on the Federal Poverty Level ($23,283 for a family of two adults and two children in 2012), by race/ethnicity
- Children living above and below the federal poverty level, by income level and family type
- Children living in areas of concentrated poverty
- Median family income (the income level at which half of families earn more, and half earn less)
- Children living in low-income working families
- Individuals receiving CalWORKs benefits, from the California Department of Social Services
Unless otherwise noted, data are estimates based on the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Depending on the indicator, breakdowns may include:
- by City, School District, and County (65,000+ residents), as single-year estimates
- by City, School District, and County (20,000+ residents), as 3-year estimates
- by City, School District, and County (10,000+ residents), as 5-year estimates
- by Legislative District, as 5-year estimates
The Census Bureau's Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) addresses some of the shortcomings of the Federal Poverty Level by accounting for a wider range of benefits and expenses that affect a family's economic resources. Poverty thresholds for the SPM are based on families' expenditures on food, shelter, clothing and utilities, and are adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of housing. For more information, see https://www.census.gov/hhes/povmeas/methodology/supplemental/research.html
For additional information about the differences between the different measures of child poverty on kidsdata, please visit: http://www.kidsdata.org/blog/?p=6974
- Family Income and Poverty
- Self-Sufficiency Standard
- Children in Poverty - Supplemental Poverty Measure (State & U.S. Only)
- Children in Poverty (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Children in Poverty (Regions of 20,000 Residents or More)
- Children in Poverty (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living Above and Below the Poverty Level (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More), by Income Level
- Children Living Above and Below the Poverty Level (Regions of 20,000 Residents or More), by Income Level
- Children Living Above and Below the Poverty Level (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More), by Income Level
- Children Living in Areas of Concentrated Poverty
- Median Family Income (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Median Family Income (Regions of 20,000 Residents or More)
- Median Family Income (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living in Low-Income Working Families (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living in Low-Income Working Families (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More)
- CalWORKs Recipients
- Births to Unmarried Women (California & U.S. Only)
- Child Population
- Children in Rural and Urban Areas (California & U.S. Only)
- Public School Enrollment
- Total Population
- Community Connectedness
- Caring Adults in the Community, by Grade Level
- High Expectations from Adults in the Community, by Grade Level
- Meaningful Participation in the Community, by Grade Level
- Total Community Assets, by Grade Level
- Early Care and Education
- Children Ages 3-5 Not Enrolled in Preschool or Kindergarten (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Children Ages 3-5 Not Enrolled in Preschool or Kindergarten (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More)
- Young Children Whose Parents Read Books with Them, by Frequency
- Annual Cost of Child Care, by Age Group and Type of Facility
- Availability of Child Care for Potential Demand
- Availability of Child Care, by Facility's Schedule and Type of Facility
- Number of Child Care Slots in Licensed Facilities, by Type of Facility
- Number of Licensed Child Care Facilities, by Type of Facility
- Parent Requests for Child Care, by Age
- Parent Requests for Evening/Weekend/Overnight Child Care
- Family Structure
- Households with and without Children, by City, School District and County (65,000 Residents or More)
- Family Structure for Children in Households, by City, School District and County (65,000 Residents or More)
- Children in the Care of Grandparents, by City, School District and County (65,000 Residents or More)
- Food Security
- Disconnected Youth
- Housing Affordability
- Fair Market Rent, by Unit Size
- Households with a High Housing Cost Burden, by City, School District and County (65,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living in Crowded Households, by County (65,000 Residents or More)
- Children Drinking One or More Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Per Day
- Children Who Ate Fast Food Two or More Times in the Past Week, by Age Group
- Children Who Eat Five or More Servings of Fruits/Vegetables Daily, by Age Group
- Students Who Ate Breakfast in Past Day, by Grade Level
- Why This Topic Is Important
Family economic status is closely tied to child health and well being. Low family income can affect the ability of the family to provide the environment and experiences a child needs for optimal cognitive and emotional development, and can contribute to behavioral and social problems, and compound poor physical health (1, 2). Children who experience economic hardship when they are young, or who experience extreme and prolonged hardship, are at greatest risk for poor outcomes (1). Not only does poverty affect health, but there is a health gradient along the economic spectrum, so that health status improves as income levels increase. For example, the health of those in the middle-income range tends to be inferior to the health of those in higher income groups (3). The effects of poverty and the stress associated with it can extend to later life, contributing to an increased risk for dropping out of school, poor adult health, poor employment outcomes, and low income (1, 2).
Households headed by single parents or parents with low education levels generally have lower earning capacity and are more likely to be low income than other households (1, 2). African American/Black, Latino, and American Indian children experience economic hardship at higher rates than white or Asian children, due in large part to a higher prevalence of risk factors such as single parenthood and low parent education (1). It is estimated that family economic hardship costs the U.S. up to $500 billion annually in health care spending, lost labor productivity, and criminal justice spending (1).
For more information on Family Income and Poverty please see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.
Sources for this narrative:
1. National Center for Children in Poverty. (2009). Ten important questions about child poverty and family economic hardship. Retrieved from: http://www.nccp.org/publications/pub_829.html#question7
2. Redd, Z., et al. (2011). Two generations in poverty: Status and trends among parents and children in the United States, 2000-2010 (Child Trends Research Brief No. 2011-25) . Retrieved from: http://www.childtrends.org/?publications=two-generations-in-poverty-status-and-trends-among-parents-and-children-in-the-united-states-2000-2010-2
3. World Health Organization. (2008). Commission on social determinants of health, final report. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/index.html
- How Children Are Faring
In 2012, an estimated 24% of California children lived below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) of $23,283 annually for a family of four. This percentage has increased by 38% since 2007. A child's likelihood of living in poverty varies by race/ethnicity and family structure. For example, statewide estimates show that 36% of African American/Black children, 32% of American Indian/Alaska Native children, and 32% of Latino children lived below the FPL in 2012, compared to 12% of white, 13% of Asian American, and 18% of multiracial children. In addition, 40% of California children in single-parent households lived below the FPL in 2012, compared to 15% of children living with two parents. An estimated 15% of California children lived in areas of concentrated poverty, where 30% or more of the population lives below the FPL, according to 2008-12 data.As an alternative to the Federal Poverty Level, the Census Bureau has created the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM), which uses a different poverty threshold based on expenses for food, shelter, clothing and utilities; it also is adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of housing. According to the SPM, about 27% of California children lived in poverty in 2012, compared to 18% nationwide. This figure is more consistent with the 2012 estimate that 26% of California children lived in 'low-income working families' (households in which at least one resident parent worked 50 weeks in the prior 12 months but income was below 200% of the FPL).
The Self-Sufficiency Standard (SSS), another measure on kidsdata.org, represents the estimated amount of money a family needs to adequately meet its basic needs. In 2014, the average SSSs for the six most common family types in California range from $43,354 to $63,979. Statewide in 2012, about half (51%) of families of all household types lived below the the SSS.
In California, the median family income was $66,215 in 2012, and ranged at the county level from $41,810 to $115,513. Median family income has been declining in recent years.
CalWORKs is a welfare program that provides cash aid and services to eligible needy families in California. In 2013, almost 1.4 million individuals in California (3.6% of the total population) received CalWORKs benefits. According to a Public Policy Institute of California report, more than three-fourths (77%) of CalWORKs recipients are children.
- Policy Implications
Family poverty has many causes and dimensions, many of which public policy can address. Maintaining a public safety net for children whose parents do not have the resources to provide adequate food, clothing, health care, and shelter can mitigate some of the effects of poverty. Parental education and employment strategies, as well as tax policy and child support enforcement, have the potential to help lift families out of poverty. Preventing a child from growing up in poverty requires a broad policy strategy targeting diverse root causes.
According to research and subject experts, policies that could influence family income and poverty include:
For more policy ideas and information on this topic see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section or visit the Urban Institute, California Budget Project, Center for Law and Social Policy, or the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org under Unemployment, Housing Affordability, and Homelessness.
- Restoring and maintaining CalWORKs/Temporary Assistance to Needy Families cash assistance and work support to families, so that benefits support an adequate living standard and families can successfully transition from welfare to work (1)
- Reforming state budget, taxation, and revenue policy, which would put less pressure on social services during lean budget years (2, 3)
- Preserving public health insurance coverage for children, including immigrant children (4)
- Supporting efforts to educate the public about expanded health insurance opportunities for children through the federal Affordable Care Act (5)
- Streamlining and automating Medi-Cal eligibility and enrollment processes to ensure that all children have health coverage (5)
- Boosting CalFresh (Food Stamps) enrollment for eligible families, through outreach and elimination of administrative barriers (1, 6)
- Maintaining and restoring state and federal funding for subsidized child care and early childhood programs for low-income working families (7)
- Strengthening child support enforcement programs that work effectively with non-custodial parents and ensure that support reaches the families that need it (8)
- Providing tax incentives and funding to enhance job training and economic development programs, targeting higher-wage jobs and industries that pay workers enough to support a family (7)
Sources for this narrative:
1. Pavetti, et al. (2010). Creating a safety net that works when the economy doesn’t: The role of the food stamp and TANF programs. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from: http://www.urban.org/uploadedpdf/412068_food_stamps_tanf.pdf
2. Bedsworth, et al. (2010). California 2025: Planning for a better future. Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_610TGR.pdf
3. California Budget Project. (2010). Searching for balance: The social and economic context of the Governor’s proposed 2010-11 budget. Retrieved from: http://www.cbp.org/pdfs/2010/100202_Searching_for_Balance.pdf
4. 100% Campaign. (2009). The importance of providing health coverage to all children. Retrieved from: http://www.100percentcampaign.org/fs/resource:id/_a_/disposition=attachment/_a_/xkozkudej1hlrk/xy51tm9qkvlrna?_c=zcq00pv753hsfd
5. Children Now. (2013). The 2013-14 Pro-Kid Policy Agenda. Retrieved from: http://www.childrennow.org/index.php/movement/prokidagenda/
6. California Budget Project. (2009). Food within reach: Strategies for increasing participation in the food stamp program in California. Retrieved from: http://cbp.org/pdfs/2009/091221_Food_Stamps.pdf
7. Edelman, et al. (2010). Reducing poverty and economic distress after ARRA: Next steps for short-term recovery and long-term economic security. Urban Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.urban.org/publications/412150.html
8. Wheaton, et al. (2007). The potential impact of increasing child support payments to TANF families. Urban Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411595_child_support.pdf
- Websites with Related Information
- California Budget Project
- Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University
- Child Trends: Children in Poverty
- ChildStats.gov, Forum on Child and Family Statistics
- Economic Mobility Project, Pew Charitable Trusts
- First Focus: Child Poverty and Family Economics
- Institute for Women's Policy Research
- MDRC: Building Knowledge to Improve Social Policy
- National Center for Children in Poverty
- National Poverty Center Working Paper Series, University of Michigan School of Public Policy
- PolicyforResults.org, Center for the Study of Social Policy
- Poverty and Opportunity, CLASP
- Spotlight on Poverty and Opportunity
- Urban Institute
- Key Reports
- A Fair Chance: Why California Should Invest in Economic Opportunity for Women and their Families, 2013, California Budget Project
- A Portrait of California, 2012, American Human Development Project of the Social Science Research Council, Burd-Sharps, S., & Lewis, K.
- California's Diminishing Resource: Children, 1/2013, Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health & USC, Myers, D.
- Child Poverty in California, 12/2011, Public Policy Institute of California, Bohn, S.
- Declining Fortunes of Children in Middle Class Families, 1/27/2011, Foundation for Child Development, Hernandez
- Falling Behind: The Impact of the Great Recession and the Budget Crisis on California's Women and Their Families, 2/2012, California Budget Project
- Getting Ahead or Losing Ground: Economic Mobility in America, 2/2008, Brookings Institution & Economic Mobility Project, Isaacs et al.
- Household Food Insecurity: Serious Concerns for Child Development, 2011, Society for Research in Child Development, Fiese, B. H., et al.
- Household Food Security in the United States in 2012, 2013, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Coleman-Jensen, A., et al.
- Kids Share 2013: Federal Expenditures on Children in 2012 and Future Projections, 7/2013, Urban Institute, Isaacs, J., et al.
- KidsCount Data Snapshot on Children Living in High Poverty Communities, 2012, Annie E. Casey Foundation
- Knowing What Works: States and Cities Build Smarter Social Policy with New and Improved Poverty Measurement, 2013, National Center for Children in Poverty, Engelhardt & Skinner
- Map the Meal Gap: Child Food Insecurity, 2011, Feeding America
- Overlooked and Undercounted 2009: Struggling to Make Ends Meet in California, 12/2009, United Way of the Bay Area, Pearce, D.
- Prosperity Threatened: Perspectives on Childhood Poverty in California, 2013, The Next Generation, Fuentes, O'Leary & Barba
- Protecting the Safety Net in Tough Times: Lessons from the States, 4/2012, National Center for Children in Poverty, Skinner, C.
- Tackling Child Poverty and Improving Child Well-Being: Lessons from Britain, 12/7/2010, Foundation for Child Development, Waldfogel
- The California Poverty Measure: A New Look at the Social Safety Net, 2013, Public Policy Institute of California, Bohn, S., et al.
- The Recession’s Ongoing Impact on America’s Children, 12/2011, First Focus & Brookings, Isaacs, J.
- The Strengths of Poor Families, 5/2009, Child Trends, Valladares & Moore
- Two Generations in Poverty: Status and Trends Among Parents and Children in the United States, 2000-2010, 11/2011, Child Trends, Redd, Z., et al.
- Who Are America’s Poor Children? Examining Health Disparities by Race and Ethnicity, 7/2011, National Center for Children in Poverty, Seith, D., & Kalof, C.
- Work and Family, 2011, The Future of Children (21)2
- County/Regional Reports
- 2014 Youth Wellbeing Report Card: Santa Monica, California, 2014, Cradle to Career Working Group
- California Family Economic Self-Sufficiency Standard, By County, 2011, Insight Center for Community Economic Development, University of Washington School of Social Work, Pearce
- Children's Report Card: Sacramento County Children's Coalition, 2013
- Fresno Community Scorecard, Fresno Business Council and ValleyPBS
- Health Profiles: Child and Teen, 2012, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
- Health Profiles: Legislative Districts, 2012, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
- Kern County Report Card, 2014, Kern County Network for Children
- Orange County Community Indicators Report, 2014
- San Diego County Report Card on Children & Families, 2013, The Children's Initiative and Johnson Group Consulting, Inc.
- Santa Barbara County Children's Scorecard, 2011, Santa Barbara County KIDS Network
- Santa Clara County Children's Agenda: 2014 Data Book, 2014, Planned Parenthood and Kids in Common
- Solano County Children's Report Card, 2013, Children's Network
- Tulare County Children’s Report Card 2010, 2011, Children's Services Network
- Tuolumne County Profile 2012
- More Data Sources For Family Income and Poverty
- America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, Forum on Child and Family Statistics, Childstats.gov
- Robert Wood Johnson County Health Rankings & Roadmaps
- The Youngest Americans: A Statistical Portrait of Infants and Toddlers in the United States, 2013, Child Trends, Murphey, D., Cooper, M., & Forry, N.