Download & Other Tools
- Definition: Number of public school students eligible to receive free or reduced price meals. A child's family income must fall below 130% of the federal poverty guidelines ($29,965 for a family of four in 2012-2013) to qualify for free meals, or below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines ($42,643 for a family of four in 2012-2013) to qualify for reduced-cost meals.
Percentage of public school students eligible to receive free or reduced price meals. A child's family income must fall below 130% of the federal poverty guidelines ($29,965 for a family of four in 2012-2013) to qualify for free meals, or below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines ($42,643 for a family of four in 2012-2013) to qualify for reduced-cost meals.
- Data Source: California Dept. of Education, Free/Reduced Price Meals Program & CalWORKS Data Files (Feb. 2014); U.S. Dept. of Education, NCES Digest of Education Statistics (Feb. 2014).
- Footnote: Years presented are the final year of a school year (e.g., 2012-2013 is shown as 2013). LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because fewer than 20 students were eligible for the program. N/A means that data are not available.
- Measures of Food Security on Kidsdata.org
Kidsdata.org provides the following indicators of food security:
- Estimated percentage of children living in households with limited or uncertain access to adequate food (i.e., Children living in "food insecure" households), calculated by Feeding America
- Percentage of children whose parents report that he or she is receiving Food Stamp benefits, from the California Health Interview Survey. These data are limited to children living in households with income below 300% of the Federal Poverty Level.
- The number and percentage of K-12 public school students who are eligible to receive free or reduced price school meals overall, and by eligibility status (i.e., the number and percentage of students who are eligible to receive free school meals, reduced price school meals, and who are not eligible for this program). A child's family income must fall below 130% of the federal poverty guidelines ($29,965 for a family of four in 2012-2013) to qualify for free meals, or below 185% of the federal poverty guidelines ($42,643 for a family of four in 2012-2013) to qualify for reduced-cost meals.
- Food Security
- Births to Unmarried Women (California & U.S. Only)
- Child Population
- Children in Rural and Urban Areas (California & U.S. Only)
- Public School Enrollment
- Total Population
- Family Income and Poverty
- Self-Sufficiency Standard
- Children in Poverty - Supplemental Poverty Measure (State & U.S. Only)
- Children in Poverty (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Children in Poverty (Regions of 20,000 Residents or More)
- Children in Poverty (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living Above and Below the Poverty Level (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More), by Income Level
- Children Living Above and Below the Poverty Level (Regions of 20,000 Residents or More), by Income Level
- Children Living Above and Below the Poverty Level (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More), by Income Level
- Children Living in Areas of Concentrated Poverty
- Median Family Income (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Median Family Income (Regions of 20,000 Residents or More)
- Median Family Income (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living in Low-Income Working Families (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living in Low-Income Working Families (Regions of 10,000 Residents or More)
- CalWORKs Recipients
- Housing Affordability
- Fair Market Rent, by Unit Size
- Households with a High Housing Cost Burden, by City, School District and County (65,000 Residents or More)
- Children Living in Crowded Households, by County (65,000 Residents or More)
- Children Drinking One or More Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Per Day
- Children Who Ate Fast Food Two or More Times in the Past Week, by Age Group
- Children Who Eat Five or More Servings of Fruits/Vegetables Daily, by Age Group
- Students Who Ate Breakfast in Past Day, by Grade Level
- Why This Topic Is Important
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) defines food insecurity as not having consistent, dependable access to enough food for active, healthy living (1). According to 2012 estimates, 10% of households with children in the U.S., about 3.9 million households, were food insecure (1). Free or reduced price school meal (FRPM) and Food Stamp programs, among others, provide a safety net to help ensure that low-income children get adequate nutrition (2). These programs help to address food insecurity among low-income children (3), and are related to improvements in students’ physical health (including obesity), behavior, school performance, and cognitive development (4, 5).
Student eligibility for FRPM serves as a proxy measure of family poverty, as the federal poverty threshold tends to underestimate the extent of poverty, particularly in high cost areas. Research indicates that families in California can earn two or more times the federal poverty level and still struggle to meet their basic needs (6). Income eligibility for FRPM programs goes up to 185% of federal poverty (about $43,000 for a family of four in 2012-2013).
For more information on Free/Reduced Price School Meals, please see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section. Also see kidsdata.org’s other topics related to family economics.
Sources for this narrative:
1. Coleman-Jensen, A., et al. (2013). Household food security in the United States in 2012. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Accessed at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err155.aspx#.U2AKNfldV8E
2. Wight, V. R., et al. (2010). Who are America’s poor children? Examining food insecurity among children in the United States. New York, New York: National Center for Children in Poverty, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University. Retrieved from: http://www.nccp.org/publications/pub_958.html.
3. Fiese, B. H., et al. (2011). Household food insecurity: Serious concerns for child development. Society for Research in Child Development, 25(3), 3-19. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521696.pdf
4. Gundersen, C., et al. (2012). The impact of the National School Lunch Program on child health: A nonparametric bounds analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 166(1), 79-91. Retrieved from: http://people.virginia.edu/~jvp3m/abstracts/SchoolLunch.pdf
5. Food Research & Action Center. (2010). Child nutrition fact sheet: National School Lunch Program. Retrieved from: http://frac.org/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cnnslp.pdf
6. As cited on kidsdata.org, California family economic Self-Sufficiency Standard. Insight Center for Community Economic Development and Dr. Diana Pearce, Center for Women's Welfare, School of Social Work, University of Washington. Retrieved from: http://www.insightcced.org/communities/cfess/ca-sss.html
- How Children Are Faring
Nearly 60% of all public school students in California are eligible for free or reduced price school meals (meaning their household incomes are less than about $43,000 for a family of four), according to 2013 data. This equates to just over 3.5 million low-income students statewide, an increase from about 3.2 million (51%) in 2007. County and school district data show increases, as well; between 2007 and 2013, percentages rose in almost all counties and in about 80% of school districts with available data. At the county level, the percentage of students eligible for free/reduced price meals ranged from 27% to 79% in 2013. Many more students are eligible for free meals than for reduced price meals. In 2013, almost 3 million students (50% of all students) were eligible for free meals, while just over 500,000 (9%) were eligible for reduced price meals.
In 2011, almost 2.5 million California children (more than 27% of the child population) lived in "food insecure" households with uncertain or inadequate access to food. Almost 30% of parents in California reported that their child received Food Stamp benefits in 2011-12.
- Policy Implications
Food and nutrition assistance programs have the potential to increase food security and provide low-income children with nutritious and affordable meals. However, these programs are not used by many children who are eligible (1). In California public schools, for example, school breakfast programs do not reach 70% of the state’s 3.4 million low-income students (2). Several challenges hinder enrollment and participation, including paperwork issues and stigma (3). In addition, high levels of salt, fat, and sugar in school lunches have contributed to the nationwide childhood obesity epidemic (4).
According to research and subject experts, policy-related actions that could improve nutrition assistance participation, and the quality of the meals themselves, include:
For more policy recommendations and research on this topic, see the kidsdata.org's Research & Links section or visit California Food Policy Advocates, the Food Research & Action Center, and Action for Healthy Kids. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org under Family Income & Poverty, and Nutrition/Breakfast.
- Utilizing authority under state law and the federal Child Nutrition Act to make it simpler and less stigmatizing for students to access free and reduced-price school meals, while streamlining administration at the school level; this includes “direct certification,” which allows school districts to automatically qualify children in families receiving CalWORKS or food stamps for free school meals (5, 6)
- Adopting school district-wide use of effective service models such as Classroom Breakfast, Second Chance Breakfast, and Grab n’ Go (different approaches to serving breakfast during the school day, in class, or outside of traditional settings) to increase participation and decrease stigma associated with subsidized breakfast (6, 7)
- Ensuring the availability of nutritious, appealing foods at school meals without competition from less healthful foods, thereby supporting healthy dietary habits (8)
- Making healthful snacks available and affordable in schools, which can lead to students’ increased consumption of fruits and vegetables (9)
Sources for this narrative:
1. Fiese, B. H., et al. (2011). Household food insecurity: Serious concerns for child development. Society for Research in Child Development, 25(3), 3-19. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521696.pdf
2. California Food Policy Advocates. (2012). School meals analysis 2010-11. Retrieved from: http://cfpa.net/school-meal-analysis10-11
3. BreakfastFirst. (2010). Research and resources. Retrieved from: http://www.breakfastfirst.org/tools/resources.shtml
4. Millimet, D., et al. (2009). School nutrition programs and the incidence of childhood obesity. Journal of Human Resources. 45(3). 640-54. Retrieved from: http://www2.gsu.edu/~ecort/MTH2010.pdf
5. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. (2009). Direct certification in the national school lunch program: State implementation progress. Report to congress. Retrieved from: http://www.fns.usda.gov/ORA/menu/Published/CNP/FILES/NSLPDirectCertification2009.pdf
6. 111th Congress. (2010). Healthy, hunger-free kids act of 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-3307
7. Shimada, T. (2009). Evaluating school breakfast and implementing second chance breakfast: Newark Unified School District. California Food Policy Advocates. Retrieved from: http://www.breakfastfirst.org/pdfs/NUSD_full%20report%20in%20color_final.pdf
8. Crawford, P., et al. (2011). The ethical basis for promoting nutritional health in public schools in the United States. Preventing Chronic Disease 8(5). 98. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181198/
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. (2013). Smart snacks in school. Retrieved from: http://www.fns.usda.gov/tags/smart-snacks-school
- Websites with Related Information
- Key Reports
- Food Insecurity and Risk for Obesity Among Children and Families: Is There a Relationship?, 4/2010, Healthy Eating Research, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Household Food Insecurity: Serious Concerns for Child Development, 2011, Society for Research in Child Development, Fiese, B. H., et al.
- Household Food Security in the United States in 2012, 2013, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Coleman-Jensen, A., et al.
- Hunger Doesn't Take A Vacation: Summer Nutrition Status Report 2013, 6/2013, Food Research and Action Center, Burke, M., et al.
- Map the Meal Gap: Child Food Insecurity, 2011, Feeding America
- Prosperity Threatened: Perspectives on Childhood Poverty in California, 2013, The Next Generation, Fuentes, O'Leary & Barba
- The Food Stamp Program in California, 2/2014, Public Policy Institute of California, Danielson, C.
- The Real Cost of a Healthy Diet, 2011, Children's HealthWatch at Boston Medical Center & Center for Hunger-Free Communities at Drexel University's School of Public Health
- The School Breakfast Program Strengthens Household Food Security Among Low-Income Households with Elementary School Children, 2011, Journal of Nutrition, Bartfeld & Ahn
- County/Regional Reports
- 2014 Youth Wellbeing Report Card: Santa Monica, California, 2014, Cradle to Career Working Group
- Fresno Community Scorecard, Fresno Business Council and ValleyPBS
- Health Profiles: Child and Teen, 2012, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
- Health Profiles: Legislative Districts, 2012, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
- Kern County Report Card, 2014, Kern County Network for Children
- San Diego County Report Card on Children & Families, 2013, The Children's Initiative and Johnson Group Consulting, Inc.
- Santa Clara County Children's Agenda: 2014 Data Book, 2014, Planned Parenthood and Kids in Common
- Solano County Children's Report Card, 2013, Children's Network
- Tulare County Children’s Report Card 2010, 2011, Children's Services Network
- Tuolumne County Profile 2012
- More Data Sources For Food Security