Students Expelled from School

Download & Other Tools
Location: (hide)

Loading...

Year(s): (edit)

Loading...

Data Type: (edit)

Loading...

Loading... (edit)

Loading...

Alameda County
School Districts
Alpine County
School Districts
Amador County
School Districts
Butte County
School Districts
Calaveras County
School Districts
Colusa County
School Districts
Contra Costa County
School Districts
Del Norte County
School Districts
El Dorado County
School Districts
Fresno County
School Districts
Glenn County
School Districts
Humboldt County
School Districts
Imperial County
School Districts
Inyo County
School Districts
Kern County
School Districts
Kings County
School Districts
Lake County
School Districts
Lassen County
School Districts
Los Angeles County
School Districts
Madera County
School Districts
Marin County
School Districts
Mariposa County
School Districts
Mendocino County
School Districts
Merced County
School Districts
Modoc County
School Districts
Mono County
School Districts
Monterey County
School Districts
Napa County
School Districts
Nevada County
School Districts
Orange County
School Districts
Placer County
School Districts
Plumas County
School Districts
Riverside County
School Districts
Sacramento County
School Districts
San Benito County
School Districts
San Bernardino County
School Districts
San Diego County
School Districts
San Francisco County
School Districts
San Joaquin County
School Districts
San Luis Obispo County
School Districts
San Mateo County
School Districts
Santa Barbara County
School Districts
Santa Clara County
School Districts
Santa Cruz County
School Districts
Shasta County
School Districts
Sierra County
School Districts
Siskiyou County
School Districts
Solano County
School Districts
Sonoma County
School Districts
Stanislaus County
School Districts
Sutter County
School Districts
Tehama County
School Districts
Trinity County
School Districts
Tulare County
School Districts
Tuolumne County
School Districts
Ventura County
School Districts
Yolo County
School Districts
Yuba County
School Districts
Loading…
(Return to top)

Learn More About Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions

Measures of Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions on Kidsdata.org
Kidsdata.org offers the following measures:
* School connectedness is a summary measure based on student reports of being treated fairly, feeling close to people, feeling happy, feeling part of school, and feeling safe at school. Non-traditional students are those enrolled in Community Day Schools or Continuation Education; according to Ed-Data, these schools make up about 10% of all public schools in California.
Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions
Bullying and Harassment at School
College Eligibility
Demographics
Community Connectedness
High School Graduation
Impact of Special Health Care Needs on Children & Families
Math Proficiency
Disconnected Youth
Pupil Support Service Personnel
Reading Proficiency
School Connectedness
School Safety
Why This Topic Is Important
Regular school attendance is a predictor of academic success (1). Frequent absences (excused or unexcused) are linked to negative school outcomes, including lower test scores and higher dropout rates, which can have lifelong effects on employment and earning potential (1, 2). A child might miss school for many reasons, including health problems or other excused absences, unexcused absences (truancy), and exclusionary punishments (suspensions and expulsions).

A growing body of research shows that students who are suspended or expelled are more likely to have academic problems, drop out of school, and enter the juvenile justice system (3, 4). In 2011-12, nearly 3.5 million K-12 public school students were suspended from school at least once in the U.S., resulting in a significant loss of classroom instruction time (4). Suspensions and expulsions disproportionately affect students of color (particularly African American boys), students with disabilities, and sexual minority youth (3, 4).
For more information on truancy, suspensions, and expulsions, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  Ginsburg, A., et al. (2014). Absences add up: How school attendance influences student success. Attendance Works. Retrieved from: http://www.attendanceworks.org/research/absences-add

2.  Child Trends Databank. (2015). High school dropout rates. Retrieved from: http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=high-school-dropout-rates

3.  Carter, P., et al. (2014). Discipline disparities series: Overview. The Equity Project at Indiana University. Retrieved from: http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers

4.  Losen, D., et al. (2015). Are we closing the school discipline gap? UCLA Center for Civil Rights Remedies. Retrieved from: https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/are-we-closing-the-school-discipline-gap
How Children Are Faring
In 2015, more than 2 million public school students in California, almost one-third of all public school students, were truant (i.e., they missed more than 30 minutes of instruction without an excuse three or more times during the school year). More than 243,000 students were suspended (3.8 per 100 students) and nearly 5,700 students were expelled (0.1 per 100 students) in California in 2015.

In 2011-13, 19% of 7th graders, 31% of 9th graders, and 47% of 11th graders in California reported that they had skipped school or cut class at least once in the past year, but most reported only skipping a few times; about 7% of 11th graders, 1 in 14, reported skipping once a week or more. Among California public middle school staff, 16% reported that skipping school or cutting class was a moderate or severe problem at their school, while that percentage was almost half (47%) among high school staff. Students who felt less connected to their schools more often reported skipping school or cutting class.
Policy Implications
Frequent use of disciplinary removal from school is associated with higher student dropout and delinquency rates (1, 2). In fact, students who regularly miss school for any reason—unexcused or excused—are at increased risk for academic failure and dropping out (3). While disciplinary removal may be necessary at times, students often are removed for minor disruptions, and suspensions and expulsions do not result in safer schools, better student behavior, or improved academic performance (1, 4, 5). In addition, research has documented disparate disciplinary treatment of youth of color, students with disabilities, sexual minority youth, and other vulnerable groups (2, 6). In 2014, the U.S. government issued formal guidance urging school leaders to take immediate action to address school discipline disparities, and state and federal law now require use of alternatives to exclusionary discipline (5, 6).

While California has made progress in reducing suspensions and expulsions in recent years, much more work is needed to ensure that all schools, from preschool to high school, implement effective, equitable discipline policies and that all students have healthy learning environments (5, 7). In accordance with state and federal guidelines, many districts are turning to evidence-based strategies that focus on creating a positive school climate and providing students with the support they need to succeed (1, 5, 7). In addition, policies that help schools document absenteeism and truancy early, and intervene in non-punitive ways, can help reduce student absences and improve academic performance (1, 3, 8).

Policy options that could reduce truancy and excessive or disproportionate suspensions and expulsions include:
  • Ensuring that schools engage families and community partners to create positive school climates, which can help prevent problematic student behavior; such efforts should involve staff training, programs to build student social-emotional and conflict resolution skills, and systems to address student behavioral health or other needs, including early screening for disabilities (4, 5)
  • Uncovering and flagging chronic absenteeism—both unexcused and excused—early in elementary and middle school by tracking individual student attendance in real-time and by collecting and publicly reporting absence data at the district, school, grade, and student subgroup levels (3, 8)
  • Ensuring that schools and community partners use attendance data to reach out to parents early, before absences become chronic, to offer support and promote good attendance; also, creating formal collaborations (e.g., School Attendance Review Boards) among local agencies and service providers to engage hard-to-reach families and address underlying causes of absences (3, 8)
  • Collecting, reporting, and using data at the school and district levels on the prevalence of suspensions and expulsions by student race/ethnicity, gender, disability, English Learner status, and LGBT identification, including cross-tabulations of these factors (e.g., African American boys with disabilities) (1, 5, 7)
  • Implementing and training staff on non-punitive school discipline policies that are clear, fair, consistent, and promote a positive learning environment; such policies should be based on a tiered system of appropriate responses to misconduct that keep students in school when possible, and they should include clear, equitable classroom behavior management practices (4, 5, 7)
  • Setting clear goals for reducing suspensions/expulsions and the disparate use of such discipline, and continuously evaluating the impact of discipline policies on all students, as directed by federal guidelines (4, 5, 7)
  • Addressing discriminatory discipline policies through administrative or legal enforcement (5, 6, 7)
For more policy ideas about truancy, suspensions, and expulsions, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section, or visit Attendance Works and the Supportive School Discipline Communities of Practice. Also see Policy Implications under these kidsdata.org topics: School Connectedness, High School Graduation, and Bullying and Harassment at School.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  Losen, D., et al. (2015). Are we closing the school discipline gap? UCLA Center for Civil Rights Remedies. Retrieved from: https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/are-we-closing-the-school-discipline-gap

2.  Carter, P., et al. (2014). Discipline disparities series: Overview. The Equity Project at Indiana University. Retrieved from: http://rtpcollaborative.indiana.edu/briefing-papers

3.  Ginsburg, A., et al. (2014). Absences add up: How school attendance influences student success. Attendance Works. Retrieved from: http://www.attendanceworks.org/research/absences-add

4.  Morgan, E., et al. (2014). The school discipline consensus report: Strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system. Council of State Governments Justice Center. Retrieved from: http://csgjusticecenter.org/youth/school-discipline-consensus-report

5.  U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Guiding principles: A resource guide for improving school climate and discipline. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/school-discipline/guiding-principles.pdf

6.  Public Counsel. (2017). Fix school discipline: Toolkit for educators. Retrieved from: http://fixschooldiscipline.org/educator-toolkit

7.  Losen, D. J., et al. (2014). Keeping California’s kids in school. UCLA Center for Civil Rights Remedies. Retrieved from: https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/summary-reports/keeping-californias-kids-in-school

8.  California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General. (n.d.). In school and on track 2016: Attorney General's 2016 report on California's elementary school truancy and absenteeism crisis. Retrieved from: http://oag.ca.gov/truancy/2016
Websites with Related Information
Key Reports
County/Regional Reports
More Data Sources For Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions