Health Status, by Race/Ethnicity

(change indicator)
Download & Other Tools
Location: (hide)

Loading...

Year(s): (edit)

Loading...

Data Type: (edit)

Loading...

Loading... (edit)

Loading...

Select All Counties
Alameda County
Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Inyo, Mariposa, Mono, and Tuolumne Counties
Butte County
Colusa, Glenn, and Tehama Counties
Contra Costa County
Del Norte, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Sierra, Siskiyou, and Trinity Counties
El Dorado County
Fresno County
Humboldt County
Imperial County
Kern County
Kings County
Lake County
Los Angeles County
Madera County
Marin County
Mendocino County
Merced County
Monterey County
Napa County
Nevada County
Orange County
Placer County
Riverside County
Sacramento County
San Benito County
San Bernardino County
San Diego County
San Francisco County
San Joaquin County
San Luis Obispo County
San Mateo County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Clara County
Santa Cruz County
Shasta County
Solano County
Sonoma County
Stanislaus County
Sutter County
Tulare County
Ventura County
Yolo County
Yuba County
Loading…
(Return to top)

Learn More About Health Status

Measures of Health Status on Kidsdata.org
On kidsdata.org, estimates of children’s health status come from self-reports (or parent-reports, for younger children) of being generally in excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor health. Data are available for children ages 0-17 overall, by income level, and by race/ethnicity.
Health Status
Family Income and Poverty
Childhood Adversity and Resilience
Early Care and Education
Food Security
Housing Affordability
Unemployment
Health Care
Why This Topic Is Important
Health status during childhood sets young people on a path toward good or poor health in adulthood (1, 2). Each stage of life influences the next, with the early years in particular providing a foundation for future health and development (1, 2, 3). Children who face disadvantage—whether in education, family functioning, exposure to traumatic events, family or neighborhood resources, or other social factors—tend to fare worse on measures of health than other children (1, 4).

Promoting child health not only improves the lives of individual children and their families, it also strengthens the health of the next generation, which may have significant social and economic impacts (1, 2, 5). Healthy young people tend to become healthier and more educated adults who are better able to contribute to society than those who struggle with health problems, which means a stronger workforce and reduced strain on public service systems (2, 5). Thus, nurturing California's children today may improve the state's future social and economic well being (2, 6).
Monitoring the overall status of children’s health is a critical step, as it allows policymakers, service providers, funders, and others to identify population trends and needs, and develop appropriate investments and strategies to support children.

For more information, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  Braveman, P., et al. (2014). Early childhood experiences shape health and well-being throughout life. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Retrieved from: http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2014/08/early-childhood-experiences-shape-health-and-well-being-througho.html

2.  Rossin-Slater, M. (2015). Promoting health in early childhood. The Future of Children, 25(1), 35-64. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43267762

3.  Richards, J., et al. (2017). Life course and social determinants professional resource brief. National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health. Retrieved from: https://www.ncemch.org/guides/lifecourse.php

4.  Heiman, H., & Artiga, S. (2015). Beyond health care: The role of social determinants in promoting health and health equity. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from: http://kff.org/disparities-policy/issue-brief/beyond-health-care-the-role-of-social-determinants-in-promoting-health-and-health-equity

5.  Halfon, N., et al. (2014). The changing nature of children’s health development: New challenges require major policy solutions. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2116-2124. Retrieved from: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/33/12/2116

6.  Myers, D. (2013). California’s diminishing resource: Children. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health. Retrieved from: http://www.lpfch.org/publication/californias-diminishing-resource-children
How Children Are Faring
It is estimated that nearly three-quarters (74%) of California children ages 0-17 were in excellent or very good health in 2013-14, up from approximately two-thirds (66%) in 2001. Among counties with data, estimates of children in very good to excellent health ranged from 54% in Mendocino County to 87% in San Mateo County. In 2001, more than 1 in 12 California children (9%) were in fair or poor health; in 2013-14 this proportion was about 1 in 20 (5%).

Children's health status varies by family income and race/ethnicity. In 2013-14, an estimated 67% of California children living below 200% of the Federal Poverty Level were in excellent or very good overall health, compared to 81% of children from higher-income families. Among racial/ethnic groups with data, rates of excellent or very good health status were highest for multiracial and white children (83%) and lowest for Hispanic/Latino children (68%) in 2013-14.
Policy Implications
Child health is shaped by a broad range of factors, including social, economic, environmental, biological, and behavioral influences (1, 2). The circumstances in which children are born and grow up impact their health and well being throughout life (1, 3). Efforts to improve child health can be strengthened by recognizing the wide range of influences on children's lives, promoting cross-sector strategies that go beyond traditional health care, and helping to ensure that all children grow up in safe and supportive environments (2, 3, 4).

Policy and program options that could improve children's health include:
  • Ensuring that every child has access to family-centered, culturally competent, coordinated health care within a “medical home” (5)
  • Supporting a comprehensive approach to health care that goes beyond treating illness to addressing social determinants of health, such as access to healthy food or safe housing; for example, ensuring that training and reimbursement mechanisms are in place for health care professionals to identify non-medical health needs and provide referrals to services (2, 3)
  • Fostering stable, nurturing family relationships and home environments by ensuring that effective support and prevention services are in place, including comprehensive parenting education, family support, and home-visiting services for families in need (3, 6)
  • Maintaining and strengthening social safety net programs for families, and increasing enrollment among eligible families in these programs, such as CalFresh (food stamps) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (4, 7)
  • Ensuring that all families, regardless of income, have access to high-quality early education and child care programs, which should include a focus on strengthening parenting skills (3, 4)
  • Continuing efforts to build neighborhoods that are safe and designed to promote health, recognizing that where children live, learn, and play greatly affects their health; as part of this, incentivizing and promoting cross-sector collaboration, for instance, among urban planning, housing, transportation, health care, public health, education, and other sectors (2, 3, 6)
For more information, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section. Also see Policy Implications under Health Care, Childhood Adversity and Resilience, and Family Income and Poverty.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  Richards, J., et al. (2017). Life course and social determinants professional resource brief. National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health. Retrieved from: https://www.ncemch.org/guides/lifecourse.php

2.  Halfon, N., et al. (2014). The changing nature of children’s health development: New challenges require major policy solutions. Health Affairs, 33(12), 2116-2124. Retrieved from: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/33/12/2116

3.  Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America. (2014). Time to act: Investing in the health of our children and communities. Retrieved from: http://www.rwjf.org/en/research-publications/find-rwjf-research/2014/01/recommendations-from-the-rwjf-commission-to-build-a-healthier-am.html

4.  Rossin-Slater, M. (2015). Promoting health in early childhood. The Future of Children, 25(1), 35-64. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43267762

5.  National Center for Medical Home Implementation. (2016). Why is medical home important? American Academy of Pediatrics. Retrieved from: https://medicalhomeinfo.aap.org/overview/Pages/Evidence.aspx

6.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Essentials for childhood: Steps to create safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/childmaltreatment/essentials.html

7.  Danielson, C. (2017). California's future: Social safety net. Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from: http://www.ppic.org/publication/californias-future-social-safety-net
Websites with Related Information
Key Reports and Research
County/Regional Reports
More Data Sources For Health Status