Juvenile Felony Arrest Rate
(change)

Download & Other Tools
Location: (hide)

Loading...

Year(s): (edit)

Loading...

Sort: (edit)

Loading...

Data Type: (edit)

Loading...

Loading... (edit)

Loading...

Select All Counties
Alameda County
Alpine County
Amador County
Butte County
Calaveras County
Colusa County
Contra Costa County
Del Norte County
El Dorado County
Fresno County
Glenn County
Humboldt County
Imperial County
Inyo County
Kern County
Kings County
Lake County
Lassen County
Los Angeles County
Madera County
Marin County
Mariposa County
Mendocino County
Merced County
Modoc County
Mono County
Monterey County
Napa County
Nevada County
Orange County
Placer County
Plumas County
Riverside County
Sacramento County
San Benito County
San Bernardino County
San Diego County
San Francisco County
San Joaquin County
San Luis Obispo County
San Mateo County
Santa Barbara County
Santa Clara County
Santa Cruz County
Shasta County
Sierra County
Siskiyou County
Solano County
Sonoma County
Stanislaus County
Sutter County
Tehama County
Trinity County
Tulare County
Tuolumne County
Ventura County
Yolo County
Yuba County
Loading…

Learn More About Juvenile Arrests

Measures of Juvenile Arrests on Kidsdata.org
This topic describes felony arrests for youth under age 18. Felony arrests, which are more serious than misdemeanors, tend to involve injury or substantial property loss. Felony crimes include violent offenses (homicide, rape, robbery, assault, and kidnapping); property offenses (burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, forgery, and arson); drug and alcohol offenses (narcotics, marijuana, dangerous drugs, and driving under the influence); sex offenses; and other offenses (such as those involving weapons, hit-and-run, and bookmaking). Indicators on kidsdata.org include:
Note: Juvenile felony arrest data do not provide a full picture of youth criminal activity. These data do not include misdemeanor arrests, and the number of arrests can shift as a result of changes in the number of police on the streets, legislative or judicial action to increase or reduce penalties, or trends in prosecutors’ charging decisions. Many felony charges also are reduced to misdemeanors or are dismissed in the later phases of the court process.
Juvenile Arrests
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs
Bullying and Harassment at School
Community Connectedness
Dating and Domestic Violence
Disconnected Youth
Emotional/Mental Health
Gang Involvement
School Safety
School Connectedness
Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions
Why This Topic Is Important
Almost all youth participate in some form of delinquent behavior (e.g., underage drinking), but few actually have contact with the juvenile justice system. Those who do tend to be at increased risk for substance use and dependency, dropping out of school, early pregnancy, and injury (1, 2). Youth who have been detained have higher rates of attempted suicide and psychiatric disorders than youth the general population (3, 4, 5). Youth who are held in detention also have higher recidivism rates and are more likely to engage in adult criminal behavior than youth who are not detained (3). In addition, youth who are arrested or detained may face difficulty gaining the educational credentials they need to succeed as adults and to obtain sustained employment.

Research has identified a number of risk factors for juvenile crime. A history of maltreatment, significant educational challenges, poverty, separation from family members, parental incarceration, exposure to violence in the home and community (2), mental illness, and substance use or dependency (5) each are related to an increased likelihood of involvement with the juvenile justice system.
For more information on juvenile arrests, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  PolicyforResults.Org. (2014). Prevent juvenile delinquency. Retrieved from: http://www.policyforresults.org/youth/prevent-juvenile-delinquency

2.   Nellis, A. (2012). The lives of juvenile lifers: Findings from a national survey. Washington DC: The Sentencing Project. Retrieved from: http://sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/publications/jj_The_Lives_of_Juvenile_Lifers.pdf

3.   PolicyforResults.Org. (2014). Reduce juvenile detention. Retrieved from: http://www.policyforresults.org/youth/reduce-juvenile-detention

4.   Abram, K. M., et al. (2014). Suicidal thoughts and behaviors among detained youth. Washington DC: Juvenile Justice Bulletin, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from: http://ojjdp.gov/pubs/243891.pdf

5.  Schubert, C. A., & Mulvey, E. P. (2014). Behavioral health problems, treatment, and outcomes in serious youthful offenders. Washington DC: Juvenile Justice Bulletin, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved from: http://ojjdp.gov/pubs/242440.pdf
How Children Are Faring
California’s juvenile felony arrest rate declined by 62% between 1998 and 2013, from 19.6 per 1,000 youth ages 10-17 to 7.5. Most counties also saw declines during this period. County-level juvenile felony arrest rates vary widely, ranging from 4.8 per 1,000 to 23.5 in 2013.

In 2013, 38.3% of juvenile felony arrests in California were for property offenses, 26.9% for violent offenses, 20.9% for other offenses (e.g., weapons, hit-and-run), 11% for drug and alcohol offenses, and 2.8% for sex offenses. Statewide, boys account for the vast majority of juvenile felony arrests.

Among racial/ethnic groups, African American youth are arrested at higher rates than their peers in other groups. In 2013, African American and Latino youth together comprised 75% of all juvenile felony arrests in California. Youth of color have been disproportionately represented in the juvenile justice system for many years, statewide and nationally. For more information, see The Future of Children’s journal issue, Juvenile Justice.

Keep in mind that arrests and arrest rates can be influenced by multiple factors, and are an imperfect measure of juvenile criminal activity.
Policy Implications

The juvenile justice system is responsible for protecting society from crime and delinquency, holding youth offenders accountable, and rehabilitating them. Policymakers within the justice, social services, and education systems can play a role in improving the way society addresses juvenile crime. Of the youth who enter California’s juvenile justice system, an estimated 30% have mental health issues (1) The process for adjudicating youth offenders often does not have the intended effect on crime control, and it does not always take into account the relative public safety risk or circumstances of individual youth (2). Within the first year after release, more than half of youth offenders (55%) are re-arrested, and about a quarter (24%) are re-incarcerated (3).

According to research and subject experts, policy options that could reduce juvenile felonies include:

  • Improving systems of care to address the mental health needs of juvenile offenders, from initial screening or assessment at first contact with the juvenile justice system to provision of appropriate treatment to incarcerated youth (2).
  • Addressing recidivism by reforming policies that increase the likelihood to re-offend, and providing services that decrease it (4), such as cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral programs, group counseling, mentoring and assistance in graduating high school (5).
  • Examining and improving existing policies for processing youth offenders through the juvenile justice system; policies should allow for case-specific assessment of the individual, the severity of the offense, the public safety risk posed by the youth, and the potential effects of system processing (1).

For more policy ideas on juvenile justice, visit the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org under the topics Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions, High School Dropouts, School Connectedness, and Gang Involvement.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  California’s Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2012). The 2012-2013 budget: Completing juvenile justice realignment. Retrieved from:http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/crim_justice/juvenile-justice-021512.aspx

2.  Guckenberg, S., & Petrosino, A. (2013). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Retrieved from: http://ric-zai-inc.com/Publications/cops-w0692-pub.pdf

3.  U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2013). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. Retrieved from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/QA/Detail.aspx?Id=732&context=9

4.  Redding, R. E. (2010). Juvenile transfer laws: An effective deterrent to delinquency? Juvenile Justice Bulletin, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/220595.pdf

5.  U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs. (n.d.). Promising and proven programs on youth violence prevention. Retrieved from: http://ojp.gov/programs/yvp_programs.htm

Websites with Related Information
Key Reports
County/Regional Reports
More Data Sources For Juvenile Arrests