Download & Other Tools
- Definition: Number of juvenile felony arrests per 1,000 youth ages 10-17.
- Data Source: California Dept. of Justice, Criminal Justice Statistics Center, Monthly Arrest and Citation Register (MACR) Data Files; CJSC published tables. Accessed at http://oag.ca.gov/crime/cjsc/criminal-justice-profiles (Jul. 2013). California Dept. of Finance, Race/Ethnic Population with Age and Sex Detail, 1990-1999, 2000-2010, 2010-2060. Accessed at http://www.dof.ca.gov (May 2013).
- Footnote: LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because there were fewer than 20 total juvenile arrests in the county.
- Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs
- Alcohol Use in Past Month, by Grade Level
- Alcohol Use (Lifetime), by Grade Level
- Alcohol Use (on School Property in Past Month), by Grade Level
- Alcohol Use (How Much Students Report Drinking), by Grade Level
- Binge Drinking in Past Month, by Grade Level
- Drinking and Driving or Riding with a Driver Who Had Been Drinking, by Grade Level
- Cigarette Use in Past Month, by Grade Level
- Cigarette Use (Lifetime), by Grade Level
- Cigarette Use (on School Property in Past Month), by Grade Level
- Inhalant Use (Lifetime), by Grade Level
- Marijuana Use in Past Month, by Grade Level
- Marijuana Use (Lifetime), by Grade Level
- Marijuana Use (on School Property in Past Month), by Grade Level
- Marijuana or Other Drug Use (How High Students Report Getting), by Grade Level
- Recreational Use of Prescription Drugs (Lifetime), by Grade Level
- Alcohol or Other Drug Use in Past Month, by Grade Level
- Alcohol or Other Drug Use (on School Property in the Past Month), by Grade Level
- Bullying and Harassment at School
- Any Reason For Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Any Bias-Related Reason For Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Disability as Reason for Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Gender as Reason for Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Race or National Origin as Reason for Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Religion as Reason for Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Sexual Orientation as Reason for Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Other Non-Specified Reason for Bullying/Harassment, by Grade Level
- Community Connectedness
- Caring Adults in the Community, by Grade Level
- High Expectations from Adults in the Community, by Grade Level
- Meaningful Participation in the Community, by Grade Level
- Total Community Assets, by Grade Level
- Dating and Domestic Violence
- Disconnected Youth
- Emotional Health
- Gang Involvement
- Neighborhood Safety
- Juvenile Arrests
- School Safety
- Perceptions of School Safety, by Grade Level
- Fear of Being Beaten Up at School, by Grade Level
- Physical Fighting at School, by Grade Level
- Carrying a Gun at School, by Grade Level
- Carrying a Knife or Other Weapon at School, by Grade Level
- School Connectedness
- Caring Adults at School, by Grade Level
- High Expectations from Teachers and Others, by Grade Level
- Meaningful Participation at School, by Grade Level
- Total School Assets, by Grade Level
- School Connectedness, by Grade Level
- Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions
- Why This Topic Is Important
Youth who are involved in the juvenile justice system tend to have higher rates of substance use, dropping out of school, injury, and early pregnancy (1). Juvenile arrest and detention also are associated with higher rates of attempted suicide and psychiatric disorders, and these youth are more likely to engage in adult criminal behavior than those who have not been detained (2, 3). In addition, youth who are arrested or detained may face difficulty gaining the educational credentials they need to succeed as adults and to obtain sustained employment.
Research has identified a number of risk factors for juvenile crime. Negative peer influences (including gang membership), a history of maltreatment, mental illness, substance abuse, and significant family dysfunction each can contribute to increased likelihood of involvement with the juvenile justice system. This is especially true for males (1, 4). Being engaged and successful in school is associated with lower risk of delinquency and incarceration. Further, for every year that a youth stays in school, the likelihood that he or she will commit a crime decreases (2). Conversely, students who drop out of high school are three times more likely to be arrested than high school graduates and eight times more likely to be incarcerated.
Juvenile crime also results in significant societal costs. Most adult criminals begin as juveniles, and the costs of arresting, prosecuting, detaining, and treating youth and adult offenders are estimated to be billions of dollars per year (1).
For more information on juvenile arrests, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.
Sources for this narrative:
1. Juvenile justice. (2008). The Future of Children, 18(2), 3-14. Retrieved from: http://www.futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/journals/journal_details/index.xml?journalid=31
2. Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. (2008). School or the streets: Crime and California’s dropout crisis. Retrieved from: http://www.fightcrime.org/state/usa/reports/school-or-streets-crime-and-americas-dropout-crisis-2008
3. PolicyforResults.Org. Reduce juvenile detention. Retrieved May 2012 from: http://www.policyforresults.org/topics/policy-areas/youth-prepared-to-succeed/reduce-juvenile-detention/juvenile-detention/executive-summary
4. Thornberry, T. P., Huizinga, D., & Loeber, R. (2004). The causes and correlates studies: Findings and policy implications. Journal of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, 9(1), 3-19. Retrieved from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/Abstract.aspx?id=206870
- How Children Are Faring
California’s juvenile felony arrest rate declined by 55% between 1998 and 2012, from 19.6 per 1,000 youth ages 10-17 to 8.8. Most counties also saw declines during this period. County-level juvenile felony arrest rates vary widely, ranging from 5.7 per 1,000 to 17.5 in 2012.
In 2012, 39.5% of juvenile felony arrests in California were for property offenses, 25.9% for violent offenses, 21.9% for other offenses (e.g., weapons, hit-and-run), 10% for drug and alcohol offenses, and 2.7% for sex offenses. Statewide, boys account for the vast majority of juvenile felony arrests.
Among racial/ethnic groups, African American youth are arrested at higher rates than their peers in other groups. In 2012, African American and Latino youth together comprised 75% of all juvenile felony arrests in California. Youth of color have been disproportionately represented in the juvenile justice system for many years, statewide and nationally. For more information, see The Future of Children’s journal issue, Juvenile Justice.
Keep in mind that arrests and arrest rates can be influenced by multiple factors, and are an imperfect measure of juvenile criminal activity.
- Policy Implications
The juvenile justice system is responsible for protecting society from crime and delinquency, holding youth offenders accountable, and rehabilitating them. Policymakers within the justice, social services, and education systems can play a role in improving the way society addresses juvenile crime. Of the youth who enter California’s juvenile justice system, an estimated 40-70% have mental health issues (2). The process for adjudicating youth offenders often does not have the intended effect on crime control (1), and it does not always take into account the relative public safety risk or circumstances of individual youth. The vast majority of youth offenders are re-arrested within two years of release, and a sizable percentage are re-incarcerated (3).
According to research and subject experts, policy options that could reduce juvenile felonies include:
- Improving systems of care to address the mental health needs of juvenile offenders, from initial screening or assessment at first contact with the juvenile justice system to provision of appropriate treatment to incarcerated youth (2).
- Addressing recidivism by reforming policies that increase the likelihood to re-offend, and providing services that decrease it (4), such as interpersonal skills training, behavioral programs, counseling, and community-based, family-style group homes tailored to the needs of the offenders (5). Creating community capacities to provide a safety net and structure for youth at risk of delinquency also can be effective (6).
- Examining and improving existing policies for processing youth offenders through the juvenile justice system; policies should allow for case-specific assessment of the individual, the severity of the offense, the public safety risk posed by the youth, and the potential effects of system processing (1).
For more policy ideas on juvenile justice, visit the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org under the topics Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions, High School Dropouts, School Connectedness, and Gang Involvement.
Sources for this narrative:
1. Guckenberg, S., & Petrosino, A. (n.d.). Formal system processing of juveniles: Effects on delinquency. Retrieved from: http://www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rstudy/64
2. Berkeley Center for Criminal Justice. (2010). Juvenile justice policy brief series: Mental health issues in California’s juvenile justice system. Retrieved from: http://www.law.berkeley.edu/img/BCCJ_Mental_Health_Policy_Brief_May_2010.pdf
3. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2010). Juvenile justice outcomes evaluation report: Youth released from the division of juvenile justice in fiscal year 2004-05. Retrieved from: http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Reports_Research/docs/Recidivism%20Report.FY0405.%20FINAL.DJJ.pdf
4. Redding, R. E. (2010). Juvenile transfer laws: An effective deterrent to delinquency? Juvenile Justice Bulletin, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/220595.pdf
5. Lipsey, M. W., Wilson, D. B., & Cothern, L. (2010). Effective interventions for serious juvenile offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/181201.pdf
6. Kubrin, C. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44(1), 165-197. Retrieved from: http://www.gwu.edu/~soc/docs/Kubrin_predicting.pdf
- Websites with Related Information
- Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice
- CrimeSolutions.gov, Office of Justice Programs
- Criminal Justice Statistics Center of the Attorney General of California
- Fight Crime: Invest In Kids, California
- National Center for Youth Law: Juvenile Justice
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- PolicyforResults.org, Center for the Study of Social Policy
- Urban Networks to Increase Thriving Youth (UNITY), Prevention Institute
- WestEd: Healthy Kids, Schools, and Communities
- Youth Crime and Justice Publications, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago
- Key Reports
- Back on Track: Supporting Youth Reentry from Out-of-Home Placement to the Community, The Sentencing Project & National Alliance to End Homelessness
- California’s After-School Commitment: Keeping Kids on Track and Out of Trouble, Fight Crime: Invest in Kids
- Characteristics of Juvenile Suicide in Confinement, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- Children’s Mental Health: What Every Policymaker Should Know, National Center for Children in Poverty
- Children's Exposure to Violence: A Comprehensive National Survey, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- Criminal-Justice and School Sanctions Against Nonheterosexual Youth: A National Longitudinal Study, Pediatrics
- Juvenile Justice, The Future of Children
- On the Right Track to Safer Communities: Steering California's Juvenile Offenders Away from Lives of Crime, Fight Crime: Invest in Kids California
- Promising Practices from the Healthy Returns Initiative: Building Connections to Health, Mental Health, and Family Support Services in Juvenile Justice, The California Endowment
- The Lives of Juvenile Lifers: Findings from a National Survey, The Sentencing Project
- County/Regional Reports
- Kern County Report Card, Kern County Network for Children
- San Diego County Report Card on Children & Families
- San Jose Mayor's Gang Prevention Task Force Strategic Work Plan 2011-13, City of San Jose
- Santa Barbara County Children's Scorecard, Santa Barbara County KIDS Network
- Solano County Children's Report Card, Children's Network
- The Developmental Assets Survey: Young People Talk About Growing Up in Silicon Valley, Project Cornerstone
- Tulare County Children’s Report Card 2010, Children's Services Network