Download & Other Tools
Download & Other Tools
- Definition: Percentage of all public school students tested in grades 3-11 who completed the English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) test with a score of Standard Met or Exceeded, by socioeconomic status (e.g., 30% of economically disadvantaged students in California scored at or above their grade-level standard in 2015).
- Data Source: California Dept. of Education, California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) results (Nov. 2015).
- Footnote: The year presented is the year in which the test was administered. Students are considered "economically disadvantaged" if they are eligible for the free/reduced price lunch program or if neither parent graduated from high school. For an explanation of the standards, by grade, see the CAASPP website. LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because there were fewer than 20 estimated students with scores meeting or exceeding the standard. N/A means that data are not available.
- Measures of Reading Proficiency on Kidsdata.org
On kidsdata.org, reading proficiency is measured by the percentage public school students meeting or exceeding their grade-level standard on the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) in English Language Arts.* These data are available by English fluency, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.*For an explanation of the standards, by grade, see http://caaspp.cde.ca.gov/sb2015/UnderstandingCAASPPReports#a.
- Reading Proficiency
- Bullying and Harassment at School
- Bullying/Harassment (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Bullying/Harassment for Bias-Related Reason (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Disability as Reason for Bullying/Harassment (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Gender as Reason for Bullying/Harassment (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Race or National Origin as Reason for Bullying/Harassment (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Religion as Reason for Bullying/Harassment (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Sexual Orientation as Reason for Bullying/Harassment (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Other Non-Specified Reason for Bullying/Harassment (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Cyberbullying (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Student Bullying/Harassment Is a Problem at School (Staff Reported)
- College Eligibility
- Demographics of Children with Special Needs
- Children with Major Disabilities, by City, School District and County (Regions of 65,000 Residents or More)
- Special Education Enrollment
- Disconnected Youth
- English Learners
- High School Graduation
- Math Proficiency
- School Connectedness
- Caring Adults at School (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- High Expectations from Teachers and Others (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Meaningful Participation at School (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Total School Assets (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- School Connectedness (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Adults at School Believe in Student Success (Staff Reported)
- Caring Adults at School (Staff Reported)
- School Gives Students Opportunities to Make a Difference (Staff Reported)
- School Motivates Students to Learn (Staff Reported)
- Students Who Are Motivated to Learn (Staff Reported)
- Youth Development or Resilience Is Fostered at School (Staff Reported)
- Pupil Support Service Personnel
- School Safety
- Perceptions of School Safety (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Fear of Being Beaten Up at School (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Physical Fighting at School (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Carrying a Gun at School (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Carrying a Knife or Other Weapon at School (Student Reported), by Grade Level
- Perceptions of School Safety for Students (Staff Reported)
- Perceptions of School Safety for Staff (Staff Reported)
- Student Physical Fighting Is a Problem at School (Staff Reported)
- Student Weapons Possession Is a Problem at School (Staff Reported)
- Truancy, Suspensions & Expulsions
- Why This Topic Is Important
Students proficient in reading are more likely to be engaged in school, graduate from high school, and go to college (1). Students with limited reading abilities have a harder time keeping up across multiple subjects, including math and science, and those who fall behind in the early grades often stay behind (1, 2). Early intervention is critical for children who are struggling with reading (2). Limited reading skills can have effects into adulthood, too, as reading proficiency is associated with better employment and income prospects, and adults with limited reading abilities are likely to have children who struggle with reading (1).
State and national data consistently show achievement gaps in reading by race/ethnicity, income, and English Learner status. Some progress has been made in reducing the gaps, but large inequities remain (3).For more information on reading proficiency see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.
Sources for this narrative:
1. Child Trends Databank. (2015). Reading proficiency. Retrieved from: http://www.childtrends.org/?indicators=reading-proficiency
2. U.S. Department of Education. (2013). For each and every child—A strategy for education equity and excellence. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/eec/equity-excellence-commission-report.pdf
3. Education Trust–West. (2015). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2015 results. Retrieved from: https://west.edtrust.org/resource/2015-national-assessment-of-education-progress-results
- How Children Are Faring
In 2015, 44% of California 3rd-11th graders met or exceeded their grade-level standard in English Language Arts/Literacy on the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP). Reading proficiency varies widely at the county level, ranging from 27% to 65% in 2015. Data also show variation by English fluency, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. For example, 30% of economically disadvantaged students in California scored at or above their grade-level standard in 2015, compared to 64% of higher income students. Among racial/ethnic groups, proficiency rates were highest among Asian American students (71%), and lowest among African American/Black students (27%).
- Policy Implications
Significant education policy changes have taken place in California and the U.S. in recent years, such as the state’s Local Control Funding Formula, the Common Core State Standards, the Smarter Balanced Assessment System, and the Every Student Succeeds Act (1, 2). Policymakers now face challenges in effectively implementing these large-scale changes, which have the potential to reduce long-standing achievement gaps in reading proficiency by race/ethnicity, income level, disability status, and English Learner status (2).
According to research and subject experts, policy options that could improve reading proficiency include:
For more policy and program ideas related to reading proficiency, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section or visit Education Trust–West, EdSource, or the Institute of Education Sciences What Works Clearinghouse. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org under Math Proficiency, High School Graduation, and Family Income and Poverty.
- Ensuring that all children have access to high-quality preschool or kindergarten readiness programs, which lay the foundation for later achievement (3, 4)
- Continuing to support K-12 schools in creating positive school climates and developing comprehensive, coordinated, evidence-based systems to address student needs, e.g., physical, emotional, behavioral, or other needs (4, 5, 6)
- In accordance with California law, supporting effective strategies to involve families in school, which is linked to improvements in student academic achievement, engagement in school, and behavior, as well as improvements in school climate (7)
- As California works to meet Every Student Succeeds Act requirements, ensuring that the state’s new accountability system is meaningful, effective, streamlined, and supports all students, particularly low-income students, children of color, students with disabilities, and English Learners (1, 2, 8)
- Supporting efforts to provide school districts and county offices of education with affordable technical assistance as they implement California’s Local Control Funding Formula, and ensuring implementation effectively focuses resources on high-need students (2, 3)
- Ensuring adequate investments in evidence-based literacy improvements at each level—early education, elementary, middle, and high school; such literacy initiatives should be grounded in research, include mechanisms to identify and support struggling students, and incorporate professional development for teachers, in alignment with Common Core Standards (2, 8)
- Supporting all teachers in improving the quality and consistency of their literacy instruction, appropriate to each grade-level (2, 8)
- Ensuring equitable student access to rigorous, high-quality instructional materials and the technology needed for Smarter Balanced Assessments and 21st century instruction (2)
- Continuing to improve the state’s education data system, so that it provides meaningful reports to local educators and leaders to inform decision-making (3)
Sources for this narrative:
1. Education Trust–West. (2015). The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: What it means for equity and accountability in California. Retrieved from: http://west.edtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/11/Every-Student-Succeeds-Act-Implications-for-CA-FINAL-PDF.pdf
2. Education Trust–West. (2014). The Education Trust–West 2014 Policy Agenda: Tectonic shifts in California's education landscape. Retrieved from: https://west.edtrust.org/resource/the-education-trust-west-2014-policy-agenda
3. Hill, L., et al. (2016). California's future: K-12 education. Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved from: http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=899
4. My Brother’s Keeper Task Force. (2014). My Brother’s Keeper Task Force report to the President. Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/053014_mbk_report.pdf
5. Adelman, H., & Taylor, L. (2015). Transforming student and learning supports: Developing a unified, comprehensive, and equitable system. Center for Mental Health in Schools. Retrieved from: http://smhp.psych.ucla.edu/newinitiative.html
6. Basch, C. E., et al. (2015). Health barriers to learning and the education opportunity gap. Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from: http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/20/69/12069.pdf
7. Thigpen, D., & Freedberg, L. (2014). The power of parents: Research underscores the impact of parent involvement in schools. EdSource and New America Media. Retrieved from: http://edsource.org/2014/the-power-of-parents-what-the-research-shows/61862
8. Haynes, M. (2015). The next chapter: Supporting literacy within ESEA. Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from: http://all4ed.org/reports-factsheets/literacywithinesea
- Websites with Related Information
- Alliance for Excellent Education
- Attendance Works
- Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning, WestEd
- Early Edge California
- Education Commission of the States
- Education Trust–West
- PolicyforResults.org, Center for the Study of Social Policy
- Public Policy Institute of California: K-12 Education
- Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis
- What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences
- Key Reports
- Achievement Gap Points to Ineffectiveness of Decades of Reforms, 2015, EdSource, Freedberg, L.
- Attendance in the Early Grades: Why It Matters for Reading, 2014, Attendance Works and Campaign for Grade-Level Reading
- Health and Academic Achievement, 2014, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Health Barriers to Learning and the Education Opportunity Gap, 2015, Progress of Education Reform, Basch, C. E., et al.
- Implementing the Common Core State Standards in California, 2014, Public Policy Institute of California, Warren, P., & Murphy, P.
- Improving the Opportunities and Outcomes of California's Students Learning English: Findings from School District–University Collaborative Partnerships, 2015, Policy Analysis for California Education, Umansky, I. M., et al.
- Student Achievement in California: 2015 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Results, 2015, Education Trust–West
- The Educational, Psychological, and Social Impact of Discrimination on the Immigrant Child, 2015, Migration Policy Institute, Brown, C. S.
- The Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: What It Means for Equity and Accountability in California, 2015, Education Trust–West
- The Local Control Funding Formula: An Essential EdSource Guide, 2016, EdSource
- The Next Chapter: Supporting Literacy Within ESEA, 2015, Alliance for Excellent Education, Haynes, M.
- The Power of Parents: Research Underscores the Impact of Parent Involvement in Schools, 2014, EdSource and New America Media, Thigpen, D., & Freedberg, L.
- The Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child Model, 2015, Journal of School Health, 85(11), Hunt, H. (Ed.)
- Time for Equity: Expanding Access to Learning, 2015, Voices in Urban Education, 40, Renée, M. (Ed.)
- County/Regional Reports
- 2014 Solano Children's Report Card, Children's Network of Solano County
- 2014 Youth Wellbeing Report Card, Santa Monica Cradle to Career
- 2016 Kern County Report Card, Kern County Network for Children
- Children's Report Card, Sacramento County Children's Coalition
- Collaborating for Equity: A Scan of the Los Angeles Educational Ecosystem, 2015, Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Potochnik, T., & Romans, A. N.
- Fresno Community Scorecard
- Orange County Community Indicators Report, 2016, Orange County Community Indicators Project
- San Diego County Report Card on Children and Families, 2015, The Children's Initiative & Live Well San Diego
- Santa Clara County Children's Agenda: 2016 Data Book, Planned Parenthood & Kids in Common
- The 21st Annual Report on the Conditions of Children in Orange County, 2015, Orange County Children's Partnership
- The Wellbeing Project, City of Santa Monica
- More Data Sources For Reading Proficiency
- California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Results, California Dept. of Education
- California District Report Cards, Education Trust–West
- Child Trends Databank: Reading Proficiency
- DataQuest, California Dept. of Education
- Diversitydatakids.org, Brandeis University, Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy
- ED Data Express: Data About Elementary and Secondary Schools in the U.S., U.S. Dept. of Education
- Education Data Partnership (Ed-Data): Fiscal, Demographic, and Performance Data on California’s K-12 Schools
- Local Control Funding Formula Reports, California Dept. of Education
- National Center for Education Statistics: Data Tools, U.S. Dept. of Education, Institute of Education Sciences