• Print
  • PDF
  • Download
  • Copy Chart
  • Embed
    This feature allows you to add a graph to your website or blog. The graph will automatically update whenever data are added to kidsdata.org.

Weight


Students Who Are Underweight or at a Healthy Weight (State Definition), by Race/Ethnicity and Grade Level: 2010 See Source and Notes
(Race/Ethnicity: All; Grade Level: All)

California Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 68.1% 66.9% 68.1%
Asian American 79.6% 81.2% 83.4%
Caucasian/White 77.5% 77.8% 79.4%
Filipino 71.6% 74.4% 77.4%
Hispanic/Latino 61.5% 61.8% 64.6%
Native American/Alaska Native 63.5% 63.2% 68.1%
Pacific Islander 60.8% 55.7% 59.3%
Alameda County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 63.6% 64.6% 65.3%
Asian American 83.3% 81.9% 84.7%
Caucasian/White 79.2% 78.2% 80.0%
Filipino 71.3% 70.9% 77.8%
Hispanic/Latino 60.6% 60.6% 63.3%
Native American/Alaska Native 66.7% 59.0% 62.7%
Pacific Islander 62.0% 48.9% 56.7%
Alpine County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White LNE LNE LNE
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE LNE LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Amador County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 73.1% 71.4% 76.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 58.5% 66.7% 64.9%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Butte County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 67.2% 67.7% 76.3%
Asian American 65.4% 75.7% 75.2%
Caucasian/White 74.1% 77.2% 76.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 64.9% 71.6% 59.7%
Native American/Alaska Native 63.3% 60.9% 65.3%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Calaveras County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 74.0% 75.7% 73.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 77.6% 70.2% 69.6%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Colusa County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 64.7% 76.8% 67.5%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 63.3% 65.3% 58.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Contra Costa County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 62.4% 62.6% 64.0%
Asian American 81.8% 82.2% 85.7%
Caucasian/White 80.6% 79.8% 81.3%
Filipino 73.3% 73.3% 74.7%
Hispanic/Latino 63.2% 60.9% 63.3%
Native American/Alaska Native 74.6% 74.6% 77.3%
Pacific Islander 66.3% 47.7% 51.5%
Del Norte County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE 81.5%
Caucasian/White 57.9% 62.7% 63.3%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE LNE 58.5%
Native American/Alaska Native 54.4% 48.8% LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
El Dorado County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 72.7% 68.6% 70.6%
Asian American 86.8% 86.1% 89.2%
Caucasian/White 85.3% 83.5% 84.4%
Filipino 89.6% 88.5% 79.1%
Hispanic/Latino 68.5% 73.0% 70.7%
Native American/Alaska Native 69.6% 76.2% 80.0%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Fresno County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 65.8% 59.8% 62.7%
Asian American 69.8% 69.1% 72.4%
Caucasian/White 73.9% 71.5% 72.7%
Filipino 70.5% 63.1% 71.4%
Hispanic/Latino 59.4% 57.7% 63.4%
Native American/Alaska Native 59.2% 51.9% 64.9%
Pacific Islander 72.7% 64.7% LNE
Glenn County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 70.3% 71.1% 77.0%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 61.5% 71.2% 64.4%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Humboldt County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE 72.4% LNE
Asian American 85.0% 83.0% 65.3%
Caucasian/White 70.2% 70.4% 73.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 58.6% 68.1% 71.6%
Native American/Alaska Native 51.8% 56.3% 72.5%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Imperial County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE 54.1% 61.5%
Asian American 75.0% 85.3% LNE
Caucasian/White 73.8% 63.7% 77.6%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 62.5% 56.6% 63.2%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Inyo County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 72.8% 79.3% 77.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 60.4% 68.2% 92.6%
Native American/Alaska Native 67.6% 67.6% LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Kern County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 64.1% 66.5% 65.2%
Asian American 72.7% 75.8% 80.0%
Caucasian/White 72.6% 70.1% 74.1%
Filipino 73.6% 72.1% 72.4%
Hispanic/Latino 60.5% 58.7% 61.3%
Native American/Alaska Native 64.4% 65.1% 65.5%
Pacific Islander 71.2% 71.2% LNE
Kings County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 62.6% 73.5% 63.1%
Asian American 77.3% 78.0% 73.0%
Caucasian/White 70.8% 70.0% 73.7%
Filipino 75.5% 72.7% 78.2%
Hispanic/Latino 58.8% 60.8% 60.2%
Native American/Alaska Native 44.6% LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Lake County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE 78.8% 76.3%
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 72.3% 68.8% 75.7%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 59.6% 66.0% 62.7%
Native American/Alaska Native 62.9% LNE 70.8%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Lassen County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 73.7% 77.0% 88.5%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE 80.8% 71.4%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Los Angeles County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 68.2% 67.5% 68.1%
Asian American 79.0% 82.1% 83.6%
Caucasian/White 78.2% 77.9% 79.2%
Filipino 73.1% 76.2% 77.1%
Hispanic/Latino 60.0% 61.4% 63.5%
Native American/Alaska Native 67.3% 62.5% 68.5%
Pacific Islander 55.0% 54.3% 56.4%
Madera County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 81.4% 67.4% 71.4%
Asian American LNE LNE 76.5%
Caucasian/White 69.6% 73.2% 63.9%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 58.8% 61.5% 64.6%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE 68.5%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Marin County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 71.7% 61.4% 66.7%
Asian American 89.1% 85.8% 84.3%
Caucasian/White 88.6% 87.7% 85.9%
Filipino LNE 87.0% LNE
Hispanic/Latino 67.1% 63.6% 72.2%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Mariposa County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 82.2% 78.1% 72.4%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE LNE LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Mendocino County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 76.9% 69.9% 75.8%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 57.8% 54.7% 61.6%
Native American/Alaska Native 56.7% 50.7% 55.4%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Merced County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 59.7% 59.1% 58.9%
Asian American 55.0% 59.1% 70.1%
Caucasian/White 65.8% 64.7% 69.5%
Filipino LNE 72.7% 84.2%
Hispanic/Latino 59.1% 59.6% 63.5%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Modoc County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 73.9% 79.2% 60.9%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE 65.0% LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Mono County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 86.1% 75.9% 86.5%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 66.7% 60.5% 73.3%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Monterey County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 60.1% 69.2% 65.4%
Asian American 73.0% 66.7% 74.0%
Caucasian/White 68.7% 70.4% 75.9%
Filipino 66.1% 64.0% 74.4%
Hispanic/Latino 58.0% 59.6% 63.5%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander 66.7% LNE 47.9%
Napa County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 69.4% 76.2% 85.4%
Asian American LNE 82.5% 87.1%
Caucasian/White 78.2% 76.7% 79.7%
Filipino 71.2% 85.1% 77.2%
Hispanic/Latino 63.5% 63.9% 65.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE 70.0% 80.6%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Nevada County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 76.3% 77.7% 85.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 65.7% 62.0% 76.0%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Orange County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 73.3% 73.3% 75.6%
Asian American 81.6% 83.9% 87.6%
Caucasian/White 82.4% 82.6% 84.6%
Filipino 75.4% 77.3% 81.3%
Hispanic/Latino 62.5% 64.0% 67.1%
Native American/Alaska Native 63.9% 74.8% 81.9%
Pacific Islander 62.8% 57.7% 58.4%
Placer County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 77.2% 68.3% 75.2%
Asian American 85.2% 83.4% 83.4%
Caucasian/White 81.3% 81.9% 84.7%
Filipino 79.4% 75.2% 77.7%
Hispanic/Latino 70.7% 71.9% 73.9%
Native American/Alaska Native 63.3% 74.1% 83.7%
Pacific Islander 83.3% 81.8% 78.6%
Plumas County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 75.8% 69.8% 76.6%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE LNE LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Riverside County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 73.4% 68.8% 70.3%
Asian American 80.3% 79.2% 78.1%
Caucasian/White 78.5% 77.0% 77.7%
Filipino 71.3% 79.3% 77.5%
Hispanic/Latino 64.8% 62.4% 66.2%
Native American/Alaska Native 66.5% 62.8% 68.6%
Pacific Islander 60.4% 48.0% 63.6%
Sacramento County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 68.0% 66.8% 69.3%
Asian American 73.8% 75.4% 78.2%
Caucasian/White 76.7% 76.7% 78.2%
Filipino 71.7% 73.2% 79.4%
Hispanic/Latino 61.5% 62.9% 65.6%
Native American/Alaska Native 65.9% 69.9% 69.4%
Pacific Islander 66.3% 60.2% 67.4%
San Benito County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 65.7% 69.5% 71.9%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 61.0% 57.0% 63.4%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
San Bernardino County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 71.1% 66.9% 69.2%
Asian American 78.6% 81.8% 81.0%
Caucasian/White 73.6% 76.1% 75.3%
Filipino 77.7% 77.2% 80.0%
Hispanic/Latino 63.4% 62.5% 65.7%
Native American/Alaska Native 64.0% 60.5% 60.7%
Pacific Islander 61.1% 48.4% 49.4%
San Diego County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 70.5% 68.9% 69.4%
Asian American 82.5% 84.1% 84.6%
Caucasian/White 80.4% 81.2% 82.5%
Filipino 71.1% 75.4% 81.1%
Hispanic/Latino 63.7% 64.0% 66.9%
Native American/Alaska Native 69.3% 66.7% 64.0%
Pacific Islander 63.0% 59.7% 67.5%
San Francisco County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 61.3% 59.0% 61.1%
Asian American 78.0% 79.0% 84.4%
Caucasian/White 79.9% 72.2% 77.9%
Filipino 65.8% 65.5% 71.1%
Hispanic/Latino 52.8% 53.3% 59.2%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander 47.3% LNE 44.0%
San Joaquin County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 69.0% 65.9% 66.7%
Asian American 73.8% 72.7% 73.9%
Caucasian/White 70.6% 71.1% 71.5%
Filipino 71.9% 68.3% 74.3%
Hispanic/Latino 62.9% 59.6% 60.8%
Native American/Alaska Native 60.7% 60.6% 60.6%
Pacific Islander 60.0% 56.0% 60.2%
San Luis Obispo County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 66.7% 60.0% 73.2%
Asian American 83.0% 75.4% 84.4%
Caucasian/White 79.2% 77.9% 78.9%
Filipino 71.1% 86.7% 70.6%
Hispanic/Latino 65.3% 64.4% 66.3%
Native American/Alaska Native 67.2% 64.7% 76.8%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
San Mateo County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 65.7% 64.2% 66.0%
Asian American 79.8% 82.1% 82.6%
Caucasian/White 79.7% 80.8% 82.1%
Filipino 66.8% 80.7% 70.3%
Hispanic/Latino 61.9% 60.9% 65.4%
Native American/Alaska Native 66.7% 68.4% LNE
Pacific Islander 45.0% 49.1% 48.0%
Santa Barbara County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 67.0% 74.1% 62.6%
Asian American 84.8% 83.2% 87.1%
Caucasian/White 70.6% 82.3% 81.7%
Filipino 64.8% 75.0% 77.9%
Hispanic/Latino 62.1% 66.7% 63.2%
Native American/Alaska Native 67.7% 69.1% 83.7%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Santa Clara County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 68.6% 67.9% 70.2%
Asian American 83.8% 85.9% 87.3%
Caucasian/White 81.2% 82.0% 81.9%
Filipino 66.6% 72.4% 77.2%
Hispanic/Latino 61.3% 62.5% 64.0%
Native American/Alaska Native 69.5% 63.2% 70.6%
Pacific Islander 54.9% 56.3% 60.2%
Santa Cruz County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 57.9% 69.7% LNE
Asian American 75.9% 73.5% 84.9%
Caucasian/White 79.6% 80.3% 80.4%
Filipino 68.8% LNE 76.7%
Hispanic/Latino 57.5% 58.6% 62.3%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Shasta County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 55.6% 59.5% 70.6%
Asian American 68.1% 82.0% 83.1%
Caucasian/White 71.6% 72.2% 80.6%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 62.9% 65.1% 71.5%
Native American/Alaska Native 57.0% 60.4% 77.5%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Sierra County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White LNE LNE 67.5%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE LNE LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Siskiyou County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 68.7% 76.2% 82.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE 53.8% 56.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Solano County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 64.8% 66.3% 66.7%
Asian American 71.7% 73.4% 80.2%
Caucasian/White 74.5% 75.2% 75.6%
Filipino 69.9% 70.2% 73.7%
Hispanic/Latino 62.5% 61.8% 65.6%
Native American/Alaska Native 62.7% 66.7% 74.4%
Pacific Islander 70.7% 54.9% 53.1%
Sonoma County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 71.2% 70.1% 75.7%
Asian American 71.8% 75.9% 80.9%
Caucasian/White 75.3% 76.7% 81.4%
Filipino 84.4% 73.0% 80.6%
Hispanic/Latino 60.4% 62.2% 67.4%
Native American/Alaska Native 64.2% 61.8% 66.3%
Pacific Islander LNE 71.1% LNE
Stanislaus County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 66.1% 65.9% 67.6%
Asian American 74.2% 76.8% 78.7%
Caucasian/White 72.7% 73.8% 73.1%
Filipino 70.9% 72.5% 77.9%
Hispanic/Latino 62.0% 63.5% 64.5%
Native American/Alaska Native 68.7% 63.6% 60.7%
Pacific Islander 72.9% 61.7% 60.0%
Sutter County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 73.2% 63.2% 62.2%
Asian American 80.9% 79.9% 79.6%
Caucasian/White 73.1% 74.9% 75.5%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 62.3% 63.2% 66.0%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Tehama County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 71.0% 68.2% 77.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 65.0% 63.5% 68.1%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE 59.0%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Trinity County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 88.2% 76.8% 75.8%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE LNE LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Tulare County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 61.6% 65.1% 73.0%
Asian American 74.8% 68.9% 70.0%
Caucasian/White 69.8% 69.5% 74.6%
Filipino 70.5% 68.5% 77.3%
Hispanic/Latino 61.7% 61.7% 66.1%
Native American/Alaska Native 52.9% 55.3% 61.0%
Pacific Islander 84.1% 66.7% 65.0%
Tuolumne County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black LNE LNE LNE
Asian American LNE LNE LNE
Caucasian/White 58.8% 64.3% 79.1%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 66.7% 59.6% 63.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Ventura County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 76.6% 73.7% 72.9%
Asian American 85.4% 84.3% 87.9%
Caucasian/White 81.4% 81.2% 83.0%
Filipino 74.5% 72.8% 82.0%
Hispanic/Latino 62.5% 60.6% 67.1%
Native American/Alaska Native 81.0% 71.7% 74.3%
Pacific Islander LNE 65.7% LNE
Yolo County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 64.6% 67.9% 63.6%
Asian American 73.9% 80.6% 85.6%
Caucasian/White 75.5% 79.0% 76.9%
Filipino LNE 78.6% LNE
Hispanic/Latino 59.3% 62.3% 61.2%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE LNE LNE
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE
Yuba County Percent
Race/Ethnicity Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 9
African American/Black 68.1% 61.4% 75.5%
Asian American 72.1% 69.9% 69.4%
Caucasian/White 72.1% 71.2% 67.0%
Filipino LNE LNE LNE
Hispanic/Latino 56.7% 63.9% 62.0%
Native American/Alaska Native 62.5% 80.0% 65.6%
Pacific Islander LNE LNE LNE

Definition: Percentage of public school students in grades 5, 7, and 9 with body composition falling within or below the Healthy Fitness Zone of the Fitnessgram assessment, by race/ethnicity.

Data Source: California Department of Education, Physical Fitness Testing Statewide Research Files. Accessed online at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/pftresearch.asp (June 2011).

Footnote: In order to meet fitness standards for body fat, children must score in the "Healthy Fitness Zone" based on skinfold measurements, body mass index, or bioelectric impedance analysis. Lean scores for body composition are included in the Healthy Fitness Zone.  LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because fewer than 20 students in a racial/ethnic group met fitness standards. N/A means that data are not available. Years presented are the final year of a school year (e.g., 2009-2010 is shown as 2010). Data are not available for 1999-2000.

Learn More About this Topic

Measures of Weight on Kidsdata.org

On kidsdata.org, indicators of weight include:

  • Percentage of public school students in grades 5, 7, and 9 who are overweight or obese per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition, by county and grade (State-level only).
  • Percentage of public school students in grades 5, 7, and 9 who are underweight or at a healthy weight per the State Department of Education definition, by grade, gender and grade, and race/ethnicity and grade (County- and school district-level).

Why This Topic Is Important

According to the 2007-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, an estimated 17% of children ages 2-19 are obese (defined as having a Body Mass Index, BMI, at or above the 95th percentile for age and gender per the 2000 CDC growth charts). This rate has nearly tripled over the past three decades (1). Obese children are at risk for a range of social and physical health problems including low self-esteem, discrimination from others, joint problems, sleep apnea, and asthma (2). Obese children, along with overweight children (defined as having a BMI between the 85th and 95th percentile), are more likely to develop diabetes and heart disease; in addition, they are likely to stay overweight or obese as adults, placing them at increased risk for serious chronic diseases (3). Obesity’s impact also extends beyond the individual; studies estimate that U.S. medical care costs related to obesity may have totaled more than $140 billion in 2008, and costs are projected to rise to $344 billion by 2018 if current trends continue (4, 5).

Research indicates that many factors may contribute to the growth in childhood obesity. For example, the rise in obesity is attributed to increased consumption of non-nutritious "junk" food and large portions; less time for families to prepare meals at home; soda consumption; less physical education at school; increase in sedentary activities, such as TV and computer use; exposure to advertisements for food; community development patterns that encourage driving and discourage walking; and decreasing safe spaces for children to play outdoors (6). Research also has shown significant racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in obesity prevalence among U.S. children and adolescents (7, 8).

Find more information and research about weight in the Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Data and statistics: Obesity rates among all children in the United States. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/data.html.
  2. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Basics about childhood obesity. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/basics.html
  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Nutrition, physical activity, and obesity. Retrieved from: http://healthypeople.gov/2020/LHI/nutrition.aspx.
  4. Finkelstein, E. A., Trogdon, J. G., Cohen, J. W., Dietz, W. (2009). Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Affairs, 28(5), 822-831.
  5. Thorpe, K. (2009). The Future Costs of Obesity: National and State Estimates of the Impact of Obesity on Direct Health Care Expenses. United Health Foundation, the American Public Health Association and Partnership for Prevention. http://www.fightchronicdisease.org/sites/default/files/docs/CostofObesityReport-FINAL.pdf
  6. Anderson, P. M., & Butcher, K. F. (2006). Childhood obesity: Trends and potential causes. The Future of Children, 16(1), 19-45. Retrieved from: http://www.futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/docs/16_01_02.pdf
  7. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2010). Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries, 59(SS-5). Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss5905.pdf
  8. Trust for America’s Health, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2008). F as in Fat: How obesity policies are failing in America. Retrieved from: http://healthyamericans.org/reports/obesity2008/Obesity2008Report.pdf

Policy Implications

California has been a leader in advancing policies to combat childhood overweight and obesity, from banning soft drinks and unhealthful food in schools to requiring nutrition labeling in chain restaurants (1). Yet the state, along with other states, continues to battle an overweight/obesity epidemic among children. While the rise in obesity may be leveling off overall, significant disparities persist by race/ethnicity and income. Obesity rates are greater for low-income youth compared to more affluent youth—particularly among boys—and for African Americans and Latinos as compared to Caucasians and Asians (2). Reducing childhood obesity and improving fitness requires equitable access to safe places to play, affordable healthful foods and beverages, and less access to high-calorie foods and sugar-sweetened drinks (3, 4). Public policy can make a difference by changing the environment in which children make food choices, live, and play.

According to research and subject experts, policy options that could influence children’s weight and fitness include:

  • Continuing to enforce and extend legislation that restricts sales of unhealthful food and drinks in schools; increases the availability of fresh fruits and vegetables and water in schools; and improves the nutritional quality of other foods and drinks sold at school (1, 3, 4)
  • Funding and facilitating physical education at school (3, 4)
  • Supporting and planning for a built environment in schools and communities that encourages walking, bicycling, and outdoor play (3, 4)
  • Targeting anti-obesity efforts in a way that addresses racial/ethnic and income disparities, including increasing access to affordable healthful food (2)
  • Promoting greater school and student participation in the School Breakfast Program, as eating a healthful breakfast can help regulate food consumption throughout the day, increase intake of micronutrients, and decrease obesity (5)
  • Supporting public education efforts to promote healthful eating and active living (3)

For more policy ideas about promoting healthy weight and fitness among children, see the Research & Links section on this page or California Project LEAN, Action for Healthy Kids, and the ENACT Local Policy Database. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org under Free/Reduced Price School Meals and Nutrition/Breakfast.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. California Center for Public Health Advocacy. (n.d.). Legislative successes. Retrieved from: http://www.publichealthadvocacy.org/legsuccess.html
  2. Babey, et al. (2010). Income disparities in obesity trends among California adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2149-2155. Retrieved from: http://www.calendow.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/Publications_Stories/4146_income_disparities_obesity_trends.pdf
  3. California Department of Public Health, California Obesity Prevention Program. (2010). 2010 California obesity prevention plan: A vision for tomorrow, strategic actions for today. Retrieved from: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/COPP/Documents/COPP-ObesityPreventionPlan-2010.pdf.pdf
  4. Ebbeling, et al. (2002). Childhood obesity: Public health crisis, common sense cure. The Lancet, 360, 473-482. Retrieved from: http://www.commercialalert.org/childhoodobesity.pdf
  5. California Food Policy Advocates. (2010). The benefits of breakfast: Health & academics. Retrieved from: http://www.breakfastfirst.org/pdfs/HealthAndAcademicBenefits.pdf

How Children Are Faring

The percentage of California 5th, 7th, and 9th graders who are overweight or obese (according to the CDC's definition) held steady from 2005 to 2010, hovering around 38%. At the state level, the percentage of 5th graders who are overweight/obese is consistently higher than the percentages for 7th and 9th graders.

The percentages of California 5th, 7th, and 9th graders who are underweight or at a healthy weight (according to the State Department of Education definition) also held fairly steady over the last decade. These data are available for counties and school districts and they, too, show wide variation at a local level. In general, a higher percentage of 5th and 7th grade girls are at or below a healthy weight than boys in those grades in California. Pacific Islander, Native American/Alaska Native, Hispanic/Latino and African American/Black groups have the lowest percentages of students at or below a healthy weight, whereas Asian American, Caucasian, and Filipino students have the highest.

Research and Links

Websites with Related Information

Key Reports

County/Regional Reports