• Print
  • PDF
  • Download
  • Copy Chart
  • Embed
    This feature allows you to add a graph to your website or blog. The graph will automatically update whenever data are added to kidsdata.org.

Prenatal Care


Infants Whose Mothers Received Prenatal Care in the First Trimester, by Race/Ethnicity: 2009 See Source and Notes
(Race/Ethnicity: All)

California Percent
African American/Black 77.9%
Asian/Pacific Islander 86.6%
Caucasian/White 87.3%
Hispanic/Latino 80.4%
Native American/Alaska Native 69.8%
Multiracial 81.4%
Alameda County Percent
African American/Black 79.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander 89.2%
Caucasian/White 88.9%
Hispanic/Latino 82.2%
Native American/Alaska Native 83.7%
Multiracial 82.1%
Alpine County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Amador County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 87.3%
Hispanic/Latino 84.1%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Butte County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 52.3%
Caucasian/White 75.8%
Hispanic/Latino 70.2%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 65.2%
Calaveras County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 82.6%
Hispanic/Latino 81.0%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Colusa County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 80.0%
Hispanic/Latino 67.0%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Contra Costa County Percent
African American/Black 77.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.2%
Caucasian/White 88.6%
Hispanic/Latino 76.4%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 82.7%
Del Norte County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 66.7%
Hispanic/Latino 70.7%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
El Dorado County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 81.6%
Caucasian/White 81.2%
Hispanic/Latino 73.0%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 83.3%
Fresno County Percent
African American/Black 89.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander 85.5%
Caucasian/White 93.3%
Hispanic/Latino 87.7%
Native American/Alaska Native 81.1%
Multiracial 88.5%
Glenn County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 80.4%
Hispanic/Latino 65.4%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Humboldt County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 65.3%
Caucasian/White 85.2%
Hispanic/Latino 82.4%
Native American/Alaska Native 61.4%
Multiracial 76.4%
Imperial County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 70.9%
Hispanic/Latino 52.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Inyo County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 86.4%
Hispanic/Latino 78.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Kern County Percent
African American/Black 72.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander 79.1%
Caucasian/White 81.4%
Hispanic/Latino 73.3%
Native American/Alaska Native 75.0%
Multiracial 77.4%
Kings County Percent
African American/Black 65.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander 84.9%
Caucasian/White 80.4%
Hispanic/Latino 69.8%
Native American/Alaska Native 76.5%
Multiracial 74.3%
Lake County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 72.7%
Hispanic/Latino 63.2%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 71.0%
Lassen County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 77.4%
Hispanic/Latino 71.1%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Los Angeles County Percent
African American/Black 78.9%
Asian/Pacific Islander 89.4%
Caucasian/White 91.3%
Hispanic/Latino 84.8%
Native American/Alaska Native 77.2%
Multiracial 85.1%
Madera County Percent
African American/Black 79.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 74.2%
Caucasian/White 86.3%
Hispanic/Latino 71.6%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Marin County Percent
African American/Black 81.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander 95.2%
Caucasian/White 95.9%
Hispanic/Latino 92.5%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 91.1%
Mariposa County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 73.1%
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Mendocino County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 71.9%
Hispanic/Latino 69.2%
Native American/Alaska Native 45.8%
Multiracial LNE
Merced County Percent
African American/Black 45.9%
Asian/Pacific Islander 49.1%
Caucasian/White 68.5%
Hispanic/Latino 67.7%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 50.0%
Modoc County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 76.6%
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Mono County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 80.0%
Hispanic/Latino 74.6%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Monterey County Percent
African American/Black 74.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 80.6%
Caucasian/White 86.4%
Hispanic/Latino 72.5%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 91.8%
Napa County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 82.8%
Caucasian/White 90.1%
Hispanic/Latino 81.4%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 86.7%
Nevada County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 81.7%
Hispanic/Latino 72.3%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Orange County Percent
African American/Black 82.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 90.3%
Caucasian/White 92.7%
Hispanic/Latino 86.4%
Native American/Alaska Native 84.0%
Multiracial 87.1%
Placer County Percent
African American/Black 63.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.8%
Caucasian/White 87.6%
Hispanic/Latino 73.6%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 82.3%
Plumas County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 77.1%
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Riverside County Percent
African American/Black 80.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 84.5%
Caucasian/White 87.4%
Hispanic/Latino 82.6%
Native American/Alaska Native 64.3%
Multiracial 82.3%
Sacramento County Percent
African American/Black 77.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander 78.8%
Caucasian/White 83.7%
Hispanic/Latino 79.8%
Native American/Alaska Native 78.9%
Multiracial 84.4%
San Benito County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 92.8%
Hispanic/Latino 84.1%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
San Bernardino County Percent
African American/Black 76.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander 86.5%
Caucasian/White 83.9%
Hispanic/Latino 81.7%
Native American/Alaska Native 73.4%
Multiracial 76.0%
San Diego County Percent
African American/Black 76.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander 86.7%
Caucasian/White 88.8%
Hispanic/Latino 77.1%
Native American/Alaska Native 76.6%
Multiracial 81.4%
San Francisco County Percent
African American/Black 69.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander 90.7%
Caucasian/White 94.6%
Hispanic/Latino 76.3%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 87.5%
San Joaquin County Percent
African American/Black 72.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander 72.9%
Caucasian/White 80.0%
Hispanic/Latino 72.8%
Native American/Alaska Native 73.5%
Multiracial 74.4%
San Luis Obispo County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 75.4%
Caucasian/White 83.1%
Hispanic/Latino 72.6%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 77.0%
San Mateo County Percent
African American/Black 84.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander 88.9%
Caucasian/White 91.9%
Hispanic/Latino 85.4%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 88.5%
Santa Barbara County Percent
African American/Black 75.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander 84.0%
Caucasian/White 86.8%
Hispanic/Latino 63.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 76.2%
Santa Clara County Percent
African American/Black 81.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.5%
Caucasian/White 90.2%
Hispanic/Latino 78.2%
Native American/Alaska Native 82.2%
Multiracial 86.0%
Santa Cruz County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 82.5%
Caucasian/White 90.1%
Hispanic/Latino 75.3%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 78.6%
Shasta County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 63.2%
Caucasian/White 71.7%
Hispanic/Latino 70.0%
Native American/Alaska Native 58.0%
Multiracial LNE
Sierra County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Siskiyou County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 83.6%
Hispanic/Latino 75.9%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Solano County Percent
African American/Black 72.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander 77.4%
Caucasian/White 81.9%
Hispanic/Latino 74.9%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 76.2%
Sonoma County Percent
African American/Black 76.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander 80.4%
Caucasian/White 85.2%
Hispanic/Latino 77.7%
Native American/Alaska Native 68.2%
Multiracial 73.7%
Stanislaus County Percent
African American/Black 72.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander 74.5%
Caucasian/White 82.9%
Hispanic/Latino 76.0%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 76.6%
Sutter County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 64.3%
Caucasian/White 68.4%
Hispanic/Latino 50.3%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Tehama County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 68.8%
Hispanic/Latino 56.3%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Trinity County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 59.3%
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Tulare County Percent
African American/Black 79.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander 74.6%
Caucasian/White 83.8%
Hispanic/Latino 74.9%
Native American/Alaska Native 63.3%
Multiracial 66.7%
Tuolumne County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Caucasian/White 79.5%
Hispanic/Latino 84.1%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial LNE
Ventura County Percent
African American/Black 74.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.8%
Caucasian/White 90.7%
Hispanic/Latino 73.8%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 74.8%
Yolo County Percent
African American/Black 77.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander 82.1%
Caucasian/White 82.8%
Hispanic/Latino 75.6%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 74.4%
Yuba County Percent
African American/Black LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 49.6%
Caucasian/White 68.0%
Hispanic/Latino 53.7%
Native American/Alaska Native LNE
Multiracial 78.8%

Definition: Percentage of infants whose mothers received prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy by race/ethnicity of mother.

Data Source: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Statistics, Vital Statistics Section, CD-Rom Public Use Birth Files and Vital Statistics Query System.

Footnote: LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because there were fewer than 20 cases in the numerator. N/A means that data are not available. For example, data for "Multiracial" women are not available prior to 2000. Data also exclude infants for whom prenatal care information is missing.

Learn More About this Topic

Measures of Prenatal Care on Kidsdata.org

Prenatal care refers to health care during pregnancy. Timely prenatal care is measured by the percentage of infants born to mothers who received prenatal care in the first trimester (1-3 months). This information also is presented by the race/ethnicity of the mother. Early prenatal care increases the likelihood of a healthy pregnancy and birth.

Why This Topic Is Important

High quality prenatal care greatly reduces the risk of infant mortality (1). Timely prenatal care, i.e. in the first trimester, is especially important, as it lowers the risk of other adverse birth outcomes, such as low birth weight, developmental delays, and premature birth (one of the leading causes of infant death nationwide) (2). Prenatal doctor visits also are important for the health of the mother. Through prenatal care, health professionals are able to identify and resolve potential medical problems and provide guidance and encouragement on good habits in general and for a healthy pregnancy.

Women whose pregnancies are unintended are more likely to delay prenatal care (3). Rates of unintended pregnancy are highest among young women ages 18-24, those living in poverty, those with less than a high school diploma, and African American/Black and Latina/Hispanic women (4). Reducing disparities in access to prenatal care and improving access to timely care for all women has been a U.S. public health priority for the past two decades. Healthy People 2020, an initiative of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that sets national public health goals, set an objective that by the year 2020, 77.9% of pregnant women would receive prenatal care beginning in the first trimester (5).

Find more information and research about prenatal care in kidsdata.org's Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Women’s Health. (2009). Prenatal care fact sheet. Retrieved from: http://www.womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/prenatal-care.cfm
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. (2011). Pediatric and Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System: PNSS health indicators. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/pednss/what_is/pnss_health_indicators.htm
  3. Logan, C., Holcombe, E., Manlove, J., & Ryan, S. (2007). The consequences of unintended childbearing: A white paper. Washington: Child Trends, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2007_05_01_FR_Consequences.pdf
  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Healthy People 2020: Family planning. Retrieved from: http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=13
  5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Healthy People 2020: Maternal infant and child health: Pregnancy and health behaviors goal MICH-10.1.  Retrieved from: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=26

Policy Implications

Increasing the rates of infants whose mothers received timely prenatal care requires access to appropriate and affordable health care (1). It also requires pregnant women to understand the importance of the care and recognize that they are pregnant, as some women delay care when they do not realize or acknowledge that they are pregnant (1). In addition, expectant mothers without health insurance coverage at the start of their pregnancy are less likely to seek timely prenatal care than insured pregnant women (1, 2).

According to research and subject experts, policy options that could influence prenatal care include:

  • Supporting health insurance coverage and early enrollment for low-income pregnant women and those who may become pregnant, particularly growing numbers of immigrant women (1)
  • Recruiting and training clinicians who are linguistically proficient and culturally attuned to patients who are immigrants, limited-English-speaking, and women of color (3, 4)
  • Increasing availability of home visiting programs (5), including leveraging federal funding available under health care reform
  • Supporting targeted public education and group prenatal care for at-risk mothers; group care can combine assessment, health education, and social support (6)

For more policy ideas and research on this topic, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section, or visit the Kaiser Family Foundation, and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org for Teen Births, Low Birthweight and Preterm Births, and Health Care.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. Braverman, et al. (2003). Promoting Access to Prenatal Care: Lessons from the California Experience. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/medicaid/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=14290
  2. Egerter, et al. (2002). Timing of Insurance Coverage and Use of Prenatal Care Among Low-Income Women. American Journal of Public Health. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/reprint/92/3/423
  3. Egerter, et al. (2004). Disparities in Maternal and Infant Health: Are We Making Progress? Lessons from California. University of California at San Francisco and the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/womenshealth/upload/Disparities-in-Maternal-and-Infant-Health-Are-We-Making-Progress-Lessons-From-California-Issue-Brief.pdf
  4. National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2009). 2009 Innovative Practices in Multicultural Health Care. http://www.ncqa.org/Portals/0/HEDISQM/CLAS/CLAS_InnovPrac_09.pdf
  5. Pew Center on the States. (2010). The Case For Home Visiting. http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/Mom_brief_Web_final.pdf
  6. Fleischman, Alan R. (2010). What Happens When Babies are Born Too Early? March of Dimes Foundation, Testimony before the US House of Representatives: Prematurity and Infant Mortality.  http://www.modimes.org/advocacy/prevention_indepth.html

How Children Are Faring

In California in 2009, 82.9% of infants were born to mothers who received prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy. This figure increased from 1995 to 2003, then declined from 2004 to 2008, and rose slightly in 2009. At the county level, the percentage of infants whose mothers receive timely prenatal care ranges widely, from 54.0% to 94.5% in 2009. As in previous years, infants of Caucasian/White and Asian/Pacific Islander women had the highest percentages of timely prenatal care in 2009; infants of Native American/Alaska Native women had the lowest.

Research and Links

Websites with Related Information

Key Reports

County/Regional Reports