• Print
  • PDF
  • Download
  • Copy Chart
  • Embed
    This feature allows you to add a graph to your website or blog. The graph will automatically update whenever data are added to kidsdata.org.

Family Structure


Children in the Care of Grandparents, by Legislative District: 2007-2011 See Source and Notes

Region Percent
United States 3.7%

Region Percent
California 3.2%
Region Percent
Assembly District 1 4.1%
Assembly District 2 4.6%
Assembly District 3 3.3%
Assembly District 4 2.4%
Assembly District 5 2.3%
Assembly District 6 1.1%
Assembly District 7 3.0%
Assembly District 8 3.0%
Assembly District 9 3.8%
Assembly District 10 3.1%
Assembly District 11 3.1%
Assembly District 12 2.6%
Assembly District 13 2.8%
Assembly District 14 2.0%
Assembly District 15 1.8%
Assembly District 16 3.7%
Assembly District 17 3.6%
Assembly District 18 3.3%
Assembly District 19 1.9%
Assembly District 20 2.3%
Assembly District 21 1.5%
Assembly District 22 1.6%
Assembly District 23 3.7%
Assembly District 24 1.8%
Assembly District 25 3.7%
Assembly District 26 3.7%
Assembly District 27 2.3%
Assembly District 28 2.5%
Assembly District 29 3.3%
Assembly District 30 4.1%
Assembly District 31 4.0%
Assembly District 32 3.7%
Assembly District 33 3.2%
Assembly District 34 4.6%
Assembly District 35 3.7%
Assembly District 36 4.2%
Assembly District 37 2.2%
Assembly District 38 2.0%
Assembly District 39 4.8%
Assembly District 40 2.5%
Assembly District 41 1.7%
Assembly District 42 0.6%
Assembly District 43 2.4%
Assembly District 44 2.6%
Assembly District 45 3.5%
Assembly District 46 2.7%
Assembly District 47 2.9%
Assembly District 48 4.3%
Assembly District 49 3.3%
Assembly District 50 3.2%
Assembly District 51 3.8%
Assembly District 52 4.7%
Assembly District 53 1.7%
Assembly District 54 3.3%
Assembly District 55 4.9%
Assembly District 56 4.0%
Assembly District 57 4.6%
Assembly District 58 4.1%
Assembly District 59 3.7%
Assembly District 60 2.6%
Assembly District 61 4.7%
Assembly District 62 5.2%
Assembly District 63 4.0%
Assembly District 64 3.3%
Assembly District 65 5.2%
Assembly District 66 3.4%
Assembly District 67 2.1%
Assembly District 68 2.1%
Assembly District 69 3.2%
Assembly District 70 0.9%
Assembly District 71 2.1%
Assembly District 72 2.8%
Assembly District 73 2.3%
Assembly District 74 2.5%
Assembly District 75 1.7%
Assembly District 76 2.1%
Assembly District 77 3.2%
Assembly District 78 3.8%
Assembly District 79 4.2%
Assembly District 80 3.8%
State Senate District 1 2.2%
State Senate District 2 3.4%
State Senate District 3 1.8%
State Senate District 4 3.8%
State Senate District 5 3.5%
State Senate District 6 3.4%
State Senate District 7 2.1%
State Senate District 8 2.2%
State Senate District 9 3.0%
State Senate District 10 2.8%
State Senate District 11 1.6%
State Senate District 12 3.3%
State Senate District 13 2.8%
State Senate District 14 3.6%
State Senate District 15 2.4%
State Senate District 16 4.1%
State Senate District 17 3.7%
State Senate District 18 4.2%
State Senate District 19 1.8%
State Senate District 20 3.8%
State Senate District 21 2.7%
State Senate District 22 2.8%
State Senate District 23 2.4%
State Senate District 24 4.3%
State Senate District 25 4.7%
State Senate District 26 3.6%
State Senate District 27 3.2%
State Senate District 28 3.1%
State Senate District 29 2.4%
State Senate District 30 4.0%
State Senate District 31 4.0%
State Senate District 32 5.1%
State Senate District 33 1.6%
State Senate District 34 3.0%
State Senate District 35 1.6%
State Senate District 36 2.4%
State Senate District 37 4.1%
State Senate District 38 2.3%
State Senate District 39 3.1%
State Senate District 40 4.0%
Congressional District 1 3.1%
Congressional District 2 4.3%
Congressional District 3 2.7%
Congressional District 4 2.3%
Congressional District 5 3.5%
Congressional District 6 1.4%
Congressional District 7 3.5%
Congressional District 8 2.6%
Congressional District 9 3.4%
Congressional District 10 2.4%
Congressional District 11 3.1%
Congressional District 12 2.0%
Congressional District 13 2.7%
Congressional District 14 1.9%
Congressional District 15 1.5%
Congressional District 16 3.1%
Congressional District 17 2.6%
Congressional District 18 3.6%
Congressional District 19 3.6%
Congressional District 20 4.2%
Congressional District 21 3.7%
Congressional District 22 3.7%
Congressional District 23 3.9%
Congressional District 24 2.0%
Congressional District 25 3.3%
Congressional District 26 2.8%
Congressional District 27 2.7%
Congressional District 28 3.7%
Congressional District 29 2.7%
Congressional District 30 1.0%
Congressional District 31 3.3%
Congressional District 32 3.9%
Congressional District 33 3.5%
Congressional District 34 2.8%
Congressional District 35 3.9%
Congressional District 36 3.0%
Congressional District 37 5.4%
Congressional District 38 4.9%
Congressional District 39 3.7%
Congressional District 40 2.2%
Congressional District 41 5.1%
Congressional District 42 2.2%
Congressional District 43 5.4%
Congressional District 44 3.2%
Congressional District 45 3.5%
Congressional District 46 1.9%
Congressional District 47 3.3%
Congressional District 48 1.2%
Congressional District 49 3.4%
Congressional District 50 1.9%
Congressional District 51 4.6%
Congressional District 52 2.5%
Congressional District 53 2.9%

Definition: Estimated percentage of children under age 18 living with grandparents who provide primary care for one or more grandchildren in the household, by legislative district. (Based on district boundaries drawn after the 2000 Census; data for new legislative districts based on the 2010 Census are scheduled to be released in the fall of 2014.)

Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey. Accessed at http://factfinder2.census.gov (Jan. 2013).

Footnote: These estimates are based on a survey of the population and are subject to both sampling and nonsampling error.

Learn More About this Topic

Measures of Family Structure on Kidsdata.org

On kidsdata.org, measures of family structure include: households with and without children under age 18; family structure for children, overall, and by race/ethnicity; and children in the care of grandparents.

These data are estimates based on the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS). Depending on the indicator, data may be available for:

  • Cities, school districts and counties with 65,000+ residents, as single-year estimates;
  • Cities, school districts, and counties with 20,000+ residents, as 3-year estimates;
  • Cities, school districts, and counties with 10,000+ residents, as 5-year estimates (however, for family structure by race/ethnicity, data are provided as 5-year estimates for regions of 50,000+ residents); and/or
  • Legislative districts, as 5-year estimates.

Family structure estimates are for children living in households and exclude those in group quarters (e.g., student dormitories). A "female-headed household” is a household maintained by a female with related children present. The female head of household typically is the children’s mother but also may be their grandmother, aunt, older sibling, or another relative. The definition of "male-headed household" is comparable. The same-sex couple category combines both unmarried and married partners due to small sample sizes. "Other households” include youth living alone or with nonrelatives.

Why This Topic Is Important

Child well being is influenced by the family environment and the presence of caring, stable adults. Family structure and the nature of the family relationships, in particular, are important factors in child development (1, 2). For example, single-parent families are more likely than two-parent families to have lower incomes and experience financial hardship (3). Financial hardship can affect families’ ability to provide the environment and experiences a child needs for optimal cognitive, emotional, and physical development (4, 5). In addition to adequate family income, positive child development is influenced by factors such as parental affection, responsiveness, and consistency, as well as high quality relationships between parents or significant adults (2). These factors are more critical than the family structure itself (6).

Over the past 30 years, the percentage of children living in households with two married parents has declined nationwide, while the percentage in families headed by a single parent or grandparents has increased (7, 8). Though it is not clear if the percentage of children living with same-sex partners has increased in recent decades (due to data limitations), research shows that children in these families are as well adjusted as children with heterosexual parents (2). Studies indicate that child development is not influenced by the gender or sexual orientation of parents.

For more information about family structure see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  ChildTrends. (2012). Family structure. Retrieved from: http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/?q=node/334

2.  Lamb, M. E. (2012). Mothers, fathers, families, and circumstances: Factors affecting children’s adjustment. Applied Developmental Science, 16(2), 98-111.

3.  Coontz, et al. (2002). Marriage, poverty, and public policy: A discussion paper from the Council on Contemporary Families. Prepared for the Fifth Annual CCF Conference. Retrieved from: http://www.contemporaryfamilies.org/economic-issues/povertypolicy.html

4.  National Center for Children in Poverty. (2009). Ten important questions about children and economic hardship. Retrieved from: http://www.nccp.org/faq.html

5.  Redd, Z., et al. (2011). Two generations in poverty: Status and trends among parents and children in the United States, 2000-2010 (Child Trends Research Brief No. 2011-25). Retrieved from: http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2011_11_28_RB_PovertyStatusTrends.pdf

6.  Schor, E. (2003). Family Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on the Family. Pediatrics, 111(6), Part 2:1539-158. Retrieved from: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/111/Supplement_2/1541.abstract

7.  Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2011). Family structure and children’s living arrangements. America’s Children: Key national indicators of well-being, 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from: http://www.childstats.gov/americaschildren/famsoc.asp

8.  U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Family table CH-7. Grandchildren living in the home of their grandparents: 1970 to present. Retrieved from: http://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/children.html

 

Policy Implications

While the family provides the essential safety net for children, public policy can reinforce that safety net when families are less secure or stable. Research shows that single-parent households tend to be less financially secure or stable than those with two married parents (1). In California, about two-thirds of households with children are headed by married couples (2). Kinship caregivers, such as grandparents, often need information, financial and emotional support, and authority to nurture, feed, house, and educate the children in their care (3). California’s non-traditional families also include same-sex couples with children. While research shows that these children do as well as children of heterosexual couples, they can face discrimination (4).

According to research and subject experts, policy options that could promote child well being in homes with a single parent, kinship caregiver, or same-sex parents include:

  • Developing and implementing responsible fatherhood programs that are comprehensive and address child support collection issues, paternal employment, relationship skills, parenting skills, and domestic violence concerns (1, 5, 6)
  • Strengthening the social and financial safety net for single custodial parents through policies that support balancing work and caring for children, provide adequate cash assistance for low-income families in need, and effectively enforce child support obligations (1, 7, 8)
  • Ensuring that kinship caregivers have the full range of support needed to provide for children in their care, enroll them in school, ensure they receive regular medical care, and avoid placement in non-relative foster care (3)
  • Eliminating legislation that discriminates against gay and lesbian populations, as the presence of anti-gay legislation and attitudes can negatively affect the mental health of gay and lesbian parents, which can affect the emotional and behavioral health of their children (4, 9, 10, 11)

For more policy ideas and research on this topic, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section, or visit the Fragile Families Well-Being Study, California Kinship or COLAGE.

Sources for this narrative:

1.  Waldfogel, et al. (2010).
Fragile families and child well-being. Future of Children, Princeton University and Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/docs/20_02_05.pdf

2. As cited on
kidsdata.org, U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey. (2011). Family structure for children in households. Retrieved from: http://www.kidsdata.org/data/topic/table/families-with-children-type250.aspx

3.  Conway, et al. (2007). 
Is kinship care good for kids? Center for Law and Social Policy. Retrieved from: http://www.clasp.org/admin/site/publications/files/0347.pdf 

4.  Lamb, M. E. (2012). Mothers, fathers, families, and circumstances: Factors affecting children’s adjustment.
Applied Developmental Science, 16(2), 98-111

5.  Paige, R. U. (2005).
APA Policy Statement: Sexual Orientation, Parents, & Children. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association. Minutes of the meeting of the Council of Representatives, July 2004, Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from: http://www.apa.org/about/policy/parenting.aspx

6.  Hansell, D. (2010). Testimony on responsible fatherhood programs. Administration for Children & Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from: http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/2010/06/t20100617a.html

7.  Knox, et al. (2009). 
Policies that strengthen fatherhood and family relationships: What do we know and what do we need to know? MDRC. Retrieved from: http://www.mdrc.org/publications/556/full.pdf

8.  McLanahan, et al. (2010).
Strengthening fragile families. Future of Children, Princeton University and Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/docs/20_02_PolicyBrief.pdf

9.  Cancian, et al. (2010). Promising antipoverty strategies for families. Urban Institute. Retrieved from:  http://www.urban.org/uploadedpdf/412073_promising_antipoverty.pdf

10.  Goldberg, et al. (2011). Stigma, social context, and mental health: Lesbian and gay couples across the transition to adoptive parenthood. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 139-150. Retrieved from: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/cou/58/1/139/

11.  Pilowsky, et al. (2006). Family discord, parental depression, and psychopathology in offspring: 20-year follow-up. Journal of the American Academy on Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(4), 452-460. Retrieved from: http://www.jaacap.com/article/S0890-8567%2809%2962065-7/abstract

12.  American Academy on Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2008). Children of parents with mental illness. Retrieved from: http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/facts_for_families/children_of_parents_with_mental_illness

How Children Are Faring

In 2011, more than one-third of California households (37%) included children, similar to previous years. Among counties with 20,000 residents or more, Imperial, Kings, and Tulare had the highest percentages of households with children (48%), and San Francisco had the lowest (19%) in 2009-11.

About two-thirds (67%) of California children lived in households headed by married couples of the opposite sex in 2011; the remaining percentage lived in households headed by single women (19%), single men (5%), unmarried couples of the opposite sex (8%), and married or unmarried same-sex couples (0.3%). In addition, about 4% of California’s children lived in the care of grandparents in 2011. Family structure varies by race/ethnicity. In 2007-11, an estimated 11% of Asian/Pacific Islander children in California lived in households headed by single women, while the same was true for about 50% of African American children.

Research and Links

Websites with Related Information

Key Reports

County/Regional Reports