Kidsdata.org is a program of the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health
  • Print
  • Download
  • Copy Chart
  • Embed
    This feature allows you to add a graph to your website or blog. The graph will automatically update whenever data are added to kidsdata.org.

Demographics of Children with Special Needs


Special Education Enrollment, by Race/Ethnicity: 2012 See Source and Notes
(Race/Ethnicity: All)

California Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 9.7% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.8% Barchart image
Asian American 4.7% Barchart image
Filipino 1.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 51.8% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 28.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.0% Barchart image
Alameda County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 21.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.5% Barchart image
Asian American 11.1% Barchart image
Filipino 3.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 33.5% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.9% Barchart image
White 25.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.7% Barchart image
Alpine County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian American LNE
Filipino LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander LNE
White LNE
Multiracial LNE
Amador County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 10.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 2.8% Barchart image
Asian American 0.7% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 24.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 60.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.8% Barchart image
Butte County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 3.0% Barchart image
Asian American 4.8% Barchart image
Filipino 0.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 20.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.5% Barchart image
White 64.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.1% Barchart image
Calaveras County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.6% Barchart image
Asian American 0.3% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 12.5% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 81.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.6% Barchart image
Colusa County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.1% Barchart image
Asian American 0.4% Barchart image
Filipino 0.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 73.7% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 19.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.6% Barchart image
Contra Costa County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 17.2% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.4% Barchart image
Asian American 5.1% Barchart image
Filipino 2.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 33.4% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.5% Barchart image
White 38.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.0% Barchart image
Del Norte County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 0.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 12.9% Barchart image
Asian American 3.9% Barchart image
Filipino 0.5% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 14.4% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 63.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.2% Barchart image
El Dorado County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.7% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.0% Barchart image
Asian American 1.8% Barchart image
Filipino 0.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 19.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.5% Barchart image
White 69.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.9% Barchart image
Fresno County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 8.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.2% Barchart image
Asian American 6.1% Barchart image
Filipino 0.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 61.7% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% Barchart image
White 20.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.6% Barchart image
Glenn County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 0.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 2.2% Barchart image
Asian American 2.7% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 49.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 40.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.1% Barchart image
Humboldt County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 12.7% Barchart image
Asian American 1.9% Barchart image
Filipino 0.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 13.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.3% Barchart image
White 63.5% Barchart image
Multiracial 5.4% Barchart image
Imperial County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.9% Barchart image
Asian American 0.3% Barchart image
Filipino 0.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 87.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 7.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.1% Barchart image
Inyo County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 5.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 23.0% Barchart image
Asian American 1.9% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 36.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 30.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.1% Barchart image
Kern County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 7.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.6% Barchart image
Asian American 0.8% Barchart image
Filipino 0.7% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 56.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 29.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.1% Barchart image
Kings County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 6.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.8% Barchart image
Asian American 1.0% Barchart image
Filipino 1.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 60.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% Barchart image
White 28.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.2% Barchart image
Lake County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.8% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 5.6% Barchart image
Asian American 0.2% Barchart image
Filipino 0.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 24.5% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 61.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.8% Barchart image
Lassen County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.2% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 6.6% Barchart image
Asian American 0.2% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 11.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.6% Barchart image
White 74.7% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.2% Barchart image
Los Angeles County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 12.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% Barchart image
Asian American 3.7% Barchart image
Filipino 1.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 62.4% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.3% Barchart image
White 16.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.8% Barchart image
Madera County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.8% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.6% Barchart image
Asian American 0.6% Barchart image
Filipino 0.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 65.1% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 27.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.4% Barchart image
Marin County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 4.8% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.5% Barchart image
Asian American 3.3% Barchart image
Filipino 0.5% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 32.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 54.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.8% Barchart image
Mariposa County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 0.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 6.5% Barchart image
Asian American 1.1% Barchart image
Filipino 0.5% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 13.8% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 75.4% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.2% Barchart image
Mendocino County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 6.4% Barchart image
Asian American 0.5% Barchart image
Filipino 0.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 33.9% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.3% Barchart image
White 52.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 5.0% Barchart image
Merced County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 4.8% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.4% Barchart image
Asian American 4.0% Barchart image
Filipino 0.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 65.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% Barchart image
White 20.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.4% Barchart image
Modoc County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian American LNE
Filipino LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander LNE
White LNE
Multiracial LNE
Mono County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 5.1% Barchart image
Asian American 0.5% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 47.5% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 43.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.3% Barchart image
Monterey County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.2% Barchart image
Asian American 1.5% Barchart image
Filipino 1.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 72.9% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.5% Barchart image
White 17.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.4% Barchart image
Napa County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% Barchart image
Asian American 1.6% Barchart image
Filipino 2.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 56.0% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 33.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.8% Barchart image
Nevada County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 2.0% Barchart image
Asian American 0.9% Barchart image
Filipino 0.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 11.3% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 78.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.8% Barchart image
Orange County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.3% Barchart image
Asian American 8.6% Barchart image
Filipino 1.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 52.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 31.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.1% Barchart image
Placer County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.9% Barchart image
Asian American 3.0% Barchart image
Filipino 2.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 19.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.5% Barchart image
White 66.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.7% Barchart image
Plumas County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 6.3% Barchart image
Asian American 0.4% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 13.4% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 74.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.4% Barchart image
Riverside County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 9.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% Barchart image
Asian American 1.5% Barchart image
Filipino 1.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 57.5% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 26.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.4% Barchart image
Sacramento County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 20.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.1% Barchart image
Asian American 7.5% Barchart image
Filipino 1.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 29.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.8% Barchart image
White 34.7% Barchart image
Multiracial 5.0% Barchart image
San Benito County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.5% Barchart image
Asian American 0.3% Barchart image
Filipino 0.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 67.1% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 29.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 0.5% Barchart image
San Bernardino County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 13.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% Barchart image
Asian American 1.7% Barchart image
Filipino 0.8% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 56.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 24.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.7% Barchart image
San Diego County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 8.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.8% Barchart image
Asian American 4.0% Barchart image
Filipino 1.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 48.1% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.6% Barchart image
White 33.4% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.5% Barchart image
San Francisco County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 22.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% Barchart image
Asian American 21.9% Barchart image
Filipino 4.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 33.5% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1.4% Barchart image
White 16.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 0.1% Barchart image
San Joaquin County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 12.6% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.8% Barchart image
Asian American 7.0% Barchart image
Filipino 2.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 45.9% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.5% Barchart image
White 27.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.3% Barchart image
San Luis Obispo County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.6% Barchart image
Asian American 0.9% Barchart image
Filipino 0.8% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 38.1% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 54.4% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.9% Barchart image
San Mateo County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 5.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.2% Barchart image
Asian American 6.8% Barchart image
Filipino 6.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 44.4% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 2.3% Barchart image
White 31.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.4% Barchart image
Santa Barbara County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.9% Barchart image
Asian American 1.1% Barchart image
Filipino 0.8% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 66.9% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% Barchart image
White 26.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.9% Barchart image
Santa Clara County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 4.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.3% Barchart image
Asian American 14.6% Barchart image
Filipino 2.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 49.0% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.6% Barchart image
White 25.4% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.4% Barchart image
Santa Cruz County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.3% Barchart image
Asian American 1.1% Barchart image
Filipino 0.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 59.4% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 34.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.8% Barchart image
Shasta County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 5.2% Barchart image
Asian American 1.3% Barchart image
Filipino 0.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 12.6% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 74.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.6% Barchart image
Sierra County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian American LNE
Filipino LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander LNE
White LNE
Multiracial LNE
Siskiyou County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 9.7% Barchart image
Asian American 0.8% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 10.8% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.5% Barchart image
White 70.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.5% Barchart image
Solano County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 24.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% Barchart image
Asian American 2.3% Barchart image
Filipino 5.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 30.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 1.1% Barchart image
White 31.4% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.4% Barchart image
Sonoma County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.7% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.0% Barchart image
Asian American 2.0% Barchart image
Filipino 0.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 42.4% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 48.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.9% Barchart image
Stanislaus County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 5.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.6% Barchart image
Asian American 2.4% Barchart image
Filipino 0.5% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 52.8% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 35.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.8% Barchart image
Sutter County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 4.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.0% Barchart image
Asian American 6.9% Barchart image
Filipino 0.5% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 37.5% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 47.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.6% Barchart image
Tehama County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 0.6% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 2.3% Barchart image
Asian American 0.5% Barchart image
Filipino 0.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 30.0% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.3% Barchart image
White 63.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.0% Barchart image
Trinity County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 0.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 11.2% Barchart image
Asian American 0.0% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 5.9% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.0% Barchart image
White 79.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 3.7% Barchart image
Tulare County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 3.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.7% Barchart image
Asian American 1.7% Barchart image
Filipino 0.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 68.2% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% Barchart image
White 23.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.6% Barchart image
Tuolumne County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 1.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 2.2% Barchart image
Asian American 0.3% Barchart image
Filipino 0.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 14.7% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.4% Barchart image
White 76.4% Barchart image
Multiracial 4.2% Barchart image
Ventura County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 2.2% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.4% Barchart image
Asian American 2.1% Barchart image
Filipino 0.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 55.0% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2% Barchart image
White 37.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 1.9% Barchart image
Yolo County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 4.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.8% Barchart image
Asian American 4.9% Barchart image
Filipino 0.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 49.3% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.7% Barchart image
White 36.7% Barchart image
Multiracial 2.5% Barchart image
Yuba County Percent Range: 0 - 95%
Range scale
African American/Black 4.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 1.0% Barchart image
Asian American 4.8% Barchart image
Filipino 0.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 30.0% Barchart image
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.7% Barchart image
White 53.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 5.1% Barchart image

Definition: Percentage of children and youth ages 0-22 receiving special education services, by race/ethnicity (e.g., in 2012, 4.7% of special education students in California were Asian American).

Data Source: Special Tabulation by the California Dept. of Education, Special Education Division; Assessment, Evaluation and Support (Oct. 2012).

Footnote: Years presented are the final year of a school year (e.g., 2011-2012 is shown as 2012). A new category was added in 2010 (Multiracial), so the data for 2010 may not be consistent with the data presented for earlier years. For percentages, LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because there were fewer than 140 students enrolled in special education.

Learn More About this Topic

Measures of Demographics of Children with Special Needs on Kidsdata.org

On kidsdata.org, indicators related to children with special health care needs include national- and state-level data on demographics, the impact of conditions on children and their families, health insurance coverage, access to, and quality of health care and other services (1). See http://www.kidsdata.org/cshcn/ for a full list of indicators.

Kidsdata.org also provides the number and percent of children under 18 with major disabilities, as 1-year and 3-year estimates (2).

In addition, the number of public school students enrolled in special education by county and school district is available, as is the number and percent by disability and by race/ethnicity at the county level (3).

Finally, kidsdata.org offers the number and percent of active enrollees in the California Children's Services (CCS) program (i.e., enrollees with paid claims), by age group and county (4).

  1. These data come from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs and the National Survey of Children's Health. On these surveys, children with special health care needs (CSHCN) are defined as those who have a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional condition and who also experience consequences due to their condition, such as above-routine use of health and related services or limitations in activities compared to other children.
  2. These data come from the American Community Survey, in which children are classified as having disabilities if they have serious difficulties in one or more of the following areas: hearing, vision, cognitive ability (asked only of ages 5-17), ambulatory ability (asked of ages 5-17), self-care (asked of ages 5-17), or independent living (asked of ages 15-17).
  3. Special education gives students with specific disabilities access to a public education. Special education programs provide early intervention services for disabled children from birth to age 3, early childhood education from ages 3-5, and instruction in the least restrictive environment up to age 22. According to the California Department of Education, children and youth ages 5-18 account for about 90% of the population enrolled in special education; children ages 0-4 and youth ages 19-22 account for about 10%.
  4. These data come from a report compiled by the Stanford University Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention. The CCS program helps to ensure access to essential health care services for California children ages 0-21 with serious diseases. It is a joint state/county program that provides medical case management and health care service authorization to eligible children. For more information and eligibility criteria, visit the CCS site. CCS eligibility extends to children with chronic diseases as well as to those with acute injuries; therefore, many, but not all, CCS enrollees can be considered 'children with special health care needs'.

Why This Topic Is Important

Approximately 1 million California children and youth have a need for health care services of a type or amount beyond that required by children generally. Their ongoing health problems -- physical, behavioral, mental, or emotional -- can affect their ability to function and participate in activities important to their education and development. In some cases their health problem, especially if not treated appropriately, can shorten their lives (1). The care of children with special health care needs is often complicated by the co-occurrence of mental health problems, depression and anxiety along with their chronic physical health conditions (1, 2). Because of the higher caregiving burdens of families of children with special needs, they tend to experience more difficulties in the areas of employment, child care, and parental stress than families of other children (1).

By definition, children with special health care needs require more health care services than other children, and they account for more than 40% of all health care costs among children nationwide despite making up only 16% of the U.S. child population (1). Though advances in medical care have extended and improved the lives of millions of children, obtaining timely, appropriate and affordable care remains a problem for many families. More than four in five children with special health care needs do not receive one or more basic aspects of quality health care, in California and nationally (1). The demographic data provided here can be useful for projecting needs and developing policies to ensure that all children with special health care needs reach their maximum health potential.

Nationally and in California, the majority of children with specific disabilities receive special education services; the most common condition among children in special education is learning disabilities (3). There are many forms of learning disabilities, which can affect speaking, reading, writing, thinking, and/or computing (4). Many of these conditions go unrecognized. Students with learning disabilities tend to have lower high school graduation and college enrollment rates, and, as adults, have higher rates of unemployment (4).

For more information on this topic, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health & Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. (2013). Children with Special Health Care Needs in California: A Profile of Key Issues
  2. Blanchard, L. T., et al. (2006). Emotional, developmental, and behavioral health of American children and their families: A report from the 2003 National Survey of Children’s Health. Pediatrics, 117(6), e1202-1212. Retrieved from: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/117/6/e1202.full.
  3. As cited on kidsdata.org, Special Tabulation by the State of California, Department of Education, Special Education Division; Assessment, Evaluation and Support. Special education enrollment, by disability: 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.kidsdata.org/data/topic/table/special-needs-education-enrollment-disability.aspx 
  4. Cortiella, C. (2011). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends, and indicators. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.ncld.org/types-learning-disabilities/what-is-ld/state-of-learning-disabilities

Policy Implications

Children and youth with special health care needs (CSHCN), like all young people, need consistent access to appropriate medical, educational, and social services and opportunities. For children with special health care needs, especially those with more complex conditions, common challenges include access to high-quality, coordinated and consistent medical care; difficulty participating in school and recreational activities; and family economic insecurity due to medical costs and caregiving demands (1, 4, 6, 8).

According to research and subject experts, policies to promote the health and well being of children with special health care needs and their families should address:

  • Comprehensive and consistent health care coverage: CSHCN need comprehensive health insurance that provides adequate medical and mental health coverage, including access to specialty care providers. These children also need consistent coverage, without gaps that can cause delays or problems receiving critical specialty services (1).
  • High-quality, well-coordinated, and consistent services: CSHCN benefit from evidence-based health care services tailored to specific and complex health needs; these services should be well-coordinated with one another and provided in the context of a “medical home” (2, 3, 8). Quality, consistent services depend on having adequate numbers of primary and specialty care providers serving CSHCN; policies and programs should address training and education toward this end. Appropriate reimbursement also is critical to maintaining an adequate provider network (7).
  • Family-centered care: Children and youth exist within the context of their families. The values, strengths, cultural norms, and priorities of families should be met with sensitivity and integrated into health services. Families also should be included as partners in all health care decision-making for CSHCN (1).
  • Early and continuous screening: Systematic screenings for special health care needs beginning early in a child’s life have the potential to reduce long-term consequences of some chronic conditions. Such screenings help identify problems early and can provide an opportunity to assess the needs and strengths of families, as part of providing tailored and family-centered health or educational services (1).
  • Inclusion: Providing CSHCN with opportunities for inclusion with other children in academic, social, and recreational settings is critical to their development and can maximize achievement and quality of life (5).
  • Support for adulthood transition: As CSHCN age, they need support from their health care, educational, and social service systems to successfully transition to adulthood. For example, they may need assistance to move from school to work or post-secondary education, from pediatric care to adult health care, and/or from family dependency to self-sufficiency (1, 5, 8).
  • Financing of care: Families of CSHCN must navigate a complicated web of service systems with dueling eligibility criteria and confusing payment policies. This can result in delayed or denied services for children and financial hardship for families. State policy must work toward a unified, efficient and comprehensive payment system for health care services (3, 7), as well as ensuring adequate funding for special education services (9).

For more policy ideas related to children with special health care needs, see the Research & Links section on this page.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. (2006). The National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs Chartbook 2005-2006. Retrieved from: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/cshcn05/
  2. Inkelas, M., et al. (2004). Access to health care for California’s children with special health care needs: Chartbook. UCLA Center for Healthier Children, Families and Communities. Retrieved from: http://www.healthychild.ucla.edu/PUBLICATIONS/Documents/Chartbook.pdf
  3. Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs and Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health. (2009). Models of care for children and youth with special health care needs: Promising models for transforming California’s system of care. Retrieved from: http://www.lpfch.org/nationalmodels/
  4. Peterson, S., et al. (2007). Quality care for special kids; Profiles of children with chronic conditions and disabilities. Mathematica Policy Research Inc. & U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/qualitycareupdate4.pdf
  5. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health & Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. (2010). Children with special health care needs: A profile of key issues facing CSHCN in California. Retrieved from: http://www.lpfch.org/specialneeds/
  6. Okumura, M., et al. (2009). Understanding factors associated with work loss for families caring for CSHCN. Pediatrics, 124(4), S393-S398. Retrieved from: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/124/Supplement_4/S392
  7. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health. (2009). California's service system for children and youth with special health care needs: Analysis and recommendations for a service system that works for children and families. Retrieved from: http://www.lpfch.org/californiaservicesystem/
  8. Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health & Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative. (2013). Children with Special Health Care Needs in California: A Profile of Key Issues
  9. Minow, M. L. (2001). Funding mechanisms in special education. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from: http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_funding.html

How Children Are Faring

An estimated 10.6% — approximately 1 million — California children under age 18 has a special health care need. According to 2009-10 data, the most commonly reported condition among California children with special health care needs was allergies (41.4%), followed by asthma (34.9%), attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (23.1%), and developmental delay (18.5%). In addition, about 52% of California’s children with special health care needs had two or more chronic conditions, and many of these children have very complex needs.

A smaller percentage of California children have major disabilities, 3.1% in 2011, meaning they have serious impairments in vision, hearing, walking, cognition, or self-care, according to the American Community Survey. Estimates of children with major disabilities vary widely at the community level.

Students with learning disabilities and speech or language impairments together comprise the majority of students in special education in California, about two-thirds of all special education students in 2012. The percentage of students enrolled in special education for autism grew at a particularly fast rate in recent years, increasing from 2.6% to 10.5% between 2002 and 2012. In fact, the percentage of students with autism in special education increased in all counties with available data in that same period.

In 2009, almost 150,000 children and youth were active enrollees in the California Children's Services (CCS) program (i.e., they had at least one paid claim that fiscal year). This equates to 4.9% of all children under age 1 and 1.1% of all children and youth ages 1-21 in California. The percentages of active enrollees varied at the county level, ranging from 2.0% to 14.2% for children under age 1 and from 0.4% to 2.3% for children and youth ages 1-21.