• Print
  • PDF
  • Download
  • Copy Chart
  • Embed
    This feature allows you to add a graph to your website or blog. The graph will automatically update whenever data are added to kidsdata.org.

Prenatal Care


Infants Whose Mothers Received Prenatal Care in the First Trimester, by Race/Ethnicity: 2010 See Source and Notes
(Race/Ethnicity: All)

California Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 78.2% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 69.7% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 81.0% Barchart image
White 87.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 82.0% Barchart image
Alameda County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 83.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 85.3% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 90.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 83.8% Barchart image
White 90.5% Barchart image
Multiracial 87.3% Barchart image
Alpine County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
White LNE
Multiracial LNE
Amador County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 78.8% Barchart image
White 90.8% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Butte County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 62.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 61.8% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 61.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 72.0% Barchart image
White 76.7% Barchart image
Multiracial 64.3% Barchart image
Calaveras County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 69.1% Barchart image
White 81.1% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Colusa County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 69.3% Barchart image
White 77.4% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Contra Costa County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 78.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 77.4% Barchart image
White 89.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 84.3% Barchart image
Del Norte County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native 64.9% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 69.4% Barchart image
White 82.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 72.2% Barchart image
El Dorado County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 80.7% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 69.1% Barchart image
White 80.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 79.3% Barchart image
Fresno County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 88.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 81.7% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 83.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 88.4% Barchart image
White 93.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 91.2% Barchart image
Glenn County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 65.2% Barchart image
White 74.3% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Humboldt County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native 70.9% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 85.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 84.6% Barchart image
White 80.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 82.0% Barchart image
Imperial County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 54.7% Barchart image
White 73.6% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Inyo County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 79.6% Barchart image
White 82.4% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Kern County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 69.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 66.7% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 79.4% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 72.7% Barchart image
White 79.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 76.8% Barchart image
Kings County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 66.7% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 83.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 72.3% Barchart image
White 85.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 76.3% Barchart image
Lake County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 60.1% Barchart image
White 68.7% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Lassen County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 72.2% Barchart image
White 73.2% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Los Angeles County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 78.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 73.9% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 89.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 85.3% Barchart image
White 91.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 84.0% Barchart image
Madera County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 75.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 81.5% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 84.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 71.7% Barchart image
White 86.7% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Marin County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 89.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 92.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 91.5% Barchart image
White 95.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 97.8% Barchart image
Mariposa County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
White 80.9% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Mendocino County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native 42.4% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 66.3% Barchart image
White 70.6% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Merced County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 54.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 55.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 64.4% Barchart image
White 67.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 67.4% Barchart image
Modoc County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
White 71.7% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Mono County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 70.1% Barchart image
White 78.8% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Monterey County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 75.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 77.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 69.6% Barchart image
White 86.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 80.0% Barchart image
Napa County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 82.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 80.1% Barchart image
White 89.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 92.6% Barchart image
Nevada County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 66.9% Barchart image
White 80.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 70.0% Barchart image
Orange County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 87.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 78.0% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 92.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 86.9% Barchart image
White 93.1% Barchart image
Multiracial 89.4% Barchart image
Placer County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 96.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 89.8% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 78.8% Barchart image
White 86.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 83.0% Barchart image
Plumas County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
White 84.2% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Riverside County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 82.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 75.0% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.3% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 83.4% Barchart image
White 87.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 82.3% Barchart image
Sacramento County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 78.2% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 67.9% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 80.0% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 80.0% Barchart image
White 83.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 78.4% Barchart image
San Benito County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 87.5% Barchart image
White 96.2% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
San Bernardino County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 76.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 73.9% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 85.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 82.5% Barchart image
White 85.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 78.9% Barchart image
San Diego County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 77.6% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 73.3% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 87.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 78.7% Barchart image
White 88.7% Barchart image
Multiracial 83.4% Barchart image
San Francisco County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 67.3% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 89.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 77.3% Barchart image
White 94.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 89.7% Barchart image
San Joaquin County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 70.7% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 67.6% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 73.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 75.6% Barchart image
White 82.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 80.1% Barchart image
San Luis Obispo County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 85.7% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 73.6% Barchart image
White 82.4% Barchart image
Multiracial 79.7% Barchart image
San Mateo County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 87.1% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 89.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 85.7% Barchart image
White 92.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 93.5% Barchart image
Santa Barbara County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 77.4% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 80.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 67.4% Barchart image
White 86.7% Barchart image
Multiracial 75.2% Barchart image
Santa Clara County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 80.0% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 73.3% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 88.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 78.6% Barchart image
White 91.9% Barchart image
Multiracial 81.3% Barchart image
Santa Cruz County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 85.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 76.5% Barchart image
White 92.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 84.2% Barchart image
Shasta County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native 58.8% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 50.7% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 62.1% Barchart image
White 71.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 72.7% Barchart image
Sierra County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
White LNE
Multiracial LNE
Siskiyou County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 78.6% Barchart image
White 74.4% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Solano County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 73.5% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 81.5% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 73.9% Barchart image
White 80.6% Barchart image
Multiracial 76.1% Barchart image
Sonoma County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 68.7% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 79.6% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 86.2% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 77.3% Barchart image
White 87.3% Barchart image
Multiracial 83.8% Barchart image
Stanislaus County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 69.7% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 75.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 76.1% Barchart image
White 79.5% Barchart image
Multiracial 67.3% Barchart image
Sutter County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 62.9% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 56.3% Barchart image
White 72.3% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Tehama County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 61.1% Barchart image
White 72.8% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Trinity County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino LNE
White 57.1% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Tulare County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 75.9% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native 60.7% Barchart image
Asian/Pacific Islander 77.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 77.8% Barchart image
White 85.0% Barchart image
Multiracial 74.4% Barchart image
Tuolumne County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander LNE
Hispanic/Latino 79.2% Barchart image
White 85.3% Barchart image
Multiracial LNE
Ventura County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 83.2% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 91.6% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 75.8% Barchart image
White 90.7% Barchart image
Multiracial 83.9% Barchart image
Yolo County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black 62.2% Barchart image
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 81.5% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 79.3% Barchart image
White 85.2% Barchart image
Multiracial 82.6% Barchart image
Yuba County Percent Range: 0 - 100%
Range scale
African American/Black LNE
American Indian/Alaska Native LNE
Asian/Pacific Islander 49.1% Barchart image
Hispanic/Latino 55.9% Barchart image
White 73.8% Barchart image
Multiracial 75.0% Barchart image

Definition: Percentage of infants whose mothers received prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy, by race/ethnicity of mother (e.g., among California infants born to African American mothers in 2010, 78.2% had mothers who received prenatal care during their first trimester).

Data Source: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Statistics, Vital Statistics Section, Birth Statistical Master Files.

Footnote: The county-level data reflect the mother's county of residence, not the county in which the birth occurred. LNE (Low Number Event) refers to data that have been suppressed because there were fewer than 20 cases. N/A means that data are not available. For example, data for "Multiracial" women are not available prior to 2000. Use caution in comparing racial/ethnic groups before and after 2000, as the racial definitions changed that year. Data also exclude infants for whom prenatal care information is missing.

Learn More About this Topic

Measures of Prenatal Care on Kidsdata.org

Prenatal care refers to health care during pregnancy. Timely prenatal care is measured by the number or percentage of infants born to mothers who received prenatal care in the first trimester (1-3 months). This information also is presented by the race/ethnicity of the mother, as a percentage and number. Early prenatal care increases the likelihood of a healthy pregnancy and birth.

Why This Topic Is Important

High quality prenatal care greatly reduces the risk of infant mortality (1). Timely prenatal care, i.e. in the first trimester, is especially important, as it lowers the risk of other adverse birth outcomes, such as low birth weight, developmental delays, and premature birth (one of the leading causes of infant death nationwide) (2). Prenatal doctor visits also are important for the health of the mother. Through prenatal care, health professionals are able to identify and resolve potential medical problems and provide guidance and encouragement on good habits in general and for a healthy pregnancy.

Women whose pregnancies are unintended are more likely to delay prenatal care (3). Rates of unintended pregnancy are highest among young women ages 18-24, those living in poverty, those with less than a high school diploma, and African American/Black and Latina/Hispanic women (4). Reducing disparities in access to prenatal care and improving access to timely care for all women has been a U.S. public health priority for the past two decades. Healthy People 2020, an initiative of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that sets national public health goals, set an objective that by the year 2020, 77.9% of pregnant women would receive prenatal care beginning in the first trimester (5).

Find more information and research about prenatal care in kidsdata.org's Research & Links section.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Women’s Health. (2009). Prenatal care fact sheet. Retrieved from: http://www.womenshealth.gov/publications/our-publications/fact-sheet/prenatal-care.cfm
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. (2011). Pediatric and Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System: PNSS health indicators. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/pednss/what_is/pnss_health_indicators.htm
  3. Logan, C., Holcombe, E., Manlove, J., & Ryan, S. (2007). The consequences of unintended childbearing: A white paper. Washington: Child Trends, Inc. Retrieved from: http://www.childtrends.org/Files//Child_Trends-2007_05_01_FR_Consequences.pdf
  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Healthy People 2020: Family planning. Retrieved from: http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=13
  5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Healthy People 2020: Maternal infant and child health: Pregnancy and health behaviors goal MICH-10.1.  Retrieved from: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=26

Policy Implications

Increasing the rates of infants whose mothers received timely prenatal care requires access to appropriate and affordable health care (1). It also requires pregnant women to understand the importance of the care and recognize that they are pregnant, as some women delay care when they do not realize or acknowledge that they are pregnant (1). In addition, expectant mothers without health insurance coverage at the start of their pregnancy are less likely to seek timely prenatal care than insured pregnant women (1, 2).

According to research and subject experts, policy options that could influence prenatal care include:

  • Supporting health insurance coverage and early enrollment for low-income pregnant women and those who may become pregnant, particularly growing numbers of immigrant women (1)
  • Recruiting and training clinicians who are linguistically proficient and culturally attuned to patients who are immigrants, limited-English-speaking, and women of color (3, 4)
  • Increasing availability of home visiting programs (5), including leveraging federal funding available under health care reform
  • Supporting targeted public education and group prenatal care for at-risk mothers; group care can combine assessment, health education, and social support (6)

For more policy ideas and research on this topic, see kidsdata.org’s Research & Links section, or visit the Kaiser Family Foundation, and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Also see Policy Implications on kidsdata.org for Teen Births, Low Birthweight and Preterm Births, and Health Care.

Sources for this narrative:

  1. Braverman, et al. (2003). Promoting access to prenatal care: Lessons from the California experience. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from: http://www.kff.org/medicaid/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=14290
  2. Egerter, et al. (2002). Timing of insurance coverage and use of prenatal care among low-income women. American Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 423-427. Retrieved from: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/reprint/92/3/423
  3. Egerter, et al. (2004). Disparities in maternal and infant health: Are we making progress? Lessons from California. University of California at San Francisco and the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from: http://www.kff.org/womenshealth/upload/Disparities-in-Maternal-and-Infant-Health-Are-We-Making-Progress-Lessons-From-California-Issue-Brief.pdf
  4. National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2009). 2009 innovative practices in multicultural health care. Retrieved from: http://www.ncqa.org/Portals/0/HEDISQM/CLAS/CLAS_InnovPrac_09.pdf
  5. Pew Center on the States. (2010). The case for home visiting. Retrieved from: http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/Mom_brief_Web_final.pdf
  6. Fleischman, A. R. (2010). What happens when babies are born too early? March of Dimes Foundation, Testimony before the US House of Representatives: Prematurity and Infant Mortality. Retrieved from: http://www.modimes.org/advocacy/prevention_indepth.html

How Children Are Faring

In California in 2010, 83.5% of infants were born to mothers who received prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy. This figure increased from 1995 to 2003, declined from 2003 to 2008, and then rose slightly again in 2009 and 2010. At the county level, the percentage of infants whose mothers receive timely prenatal care ranges widely, from 56.2% to 94.1% in 2010 among counties with available data. As in previous years, infants of white and Asian/Pacific Islander women had the highest percentages of timely prenatal care in 2010; infants of American Indian/Alaska Native women had the lowest.

Research and Links

Websites with Related Information

Key Reports

County/Regional Reports